Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA - AAI question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I only have two words for the citrus guys......Holding Company...or maybe staple staple ???


I agree with Lear, this serves no purpose. I'm all for holding to our position, but just trying to rile up the other side to no logical purpose doesn't help any of us out. Just my two cents.

Fraternally,
PW
 
Blah Blah Blah.......

I know lets take a staple to the bottom of the Air Tran list because we all want so much for them to be happy when they get here right ??

I am sure that they still would still find something to complain about even if we did that for them.

ALPA's only mission in this deal is to burn the Southwest house down, I only hope it takes 20 years for them to succeed. They are going to drag their feet until we all get the same deal that the America West guys got !!
 
Blah Blah Blah.......

I know lets take a staple to the bottom of the Air Tran list because we all want so much for them to be happy when they get here right ??

I am sure that they still would still find something to complain about even if we did that for them.

ALPA's only mission in this deal is to burn the Southwest house down, I only hope it takes 20 years for them to succeed. They are going to drag their feet until we all get the same deal that the America West guys got !!



"Blah, Blah, Blah" was right. You should have stopped right there. That was the most intelligent thing you have written. :laugh:
 
Johnsonrod,

When did you NOT get hired? Your legendary anti-Southwest spin has to have something behind it...

You weren't the guy who got fired in training were you?
 
You mean transitional items that you want to drag into the process agreement. Don't you?

I don't think there is anything in the proposed process agreement that doesn't belong there. You are welcome to disagree, but that doesn't make you right. There are two sides to this negotiation. SWAPA will represent your interests, and ALPA will represent ours. No reason to get upset about it.

I bet Steve Chase isn't there.

You have your structure, we have ours. Why are you worried about ours? :confused:
 
Why are you worried about ours?

The same reason your members are worried. ALPA sucks and if ALPA is allowed to run free it will screw this deal up for both sides and nobody seems to trust you.
 
The same reason your members are worried. ALPA sucks and if ALPA is allowed to run free it will screw this deal up for both sides and nobody seems to trust you.

I'm not worried at all, i'd much rather have ALPA representing me than NPA.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top