Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Ties

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
gator_hater said:
Are you inferring that there were no 'suspicious' deaths under Clinton (Vince Foster comes to mind). Also are you ignoring that several of the worlds top spy agencies came to the same conculsion (England and Israel come to mind).

Sure we didn't lose many military guys under Clinton, but we lost 3000 of our neighbors because he was to busy chasing interns and covering his tracks to
chase Bin Laden and uncover HIS tracks.
Do you mean implying? And yes, I am implying that there is not enough evidence to support the notion that Clinton had anything to do with any murders. If you provide a link, it will have 0 credibility to me if its some right wing whacko organization.

Au contraire. The Clinton White House did indeed go after Bin Laden and it was much more than the misdirected cruise missles. Bin Laden was the number one target for US intelligence in Clinton's terms. It is popular for the dittoheads, the Hannity's etc to superficially say that he did nothing......far from the truth. It is the Bush administration that ignored warnings that terrorists were planning on using airplanes as missles. Clinton's admin provided all of the material that stated that there was going to a massive attack on the passdown to the new admin. What did Bush do? Nothing. Before 9-11, Bush even complained that the daily intel involved too many pages and he wanted them condensed. He was more concerned with tax cuts for the wealthy and trying to placate Americans by providing a $300.00 dollar advance. Bush and his admin lied about WMD's to justify his personal vendetta and now 2500 soldiers are dead.

My signature stands.

"Will somebody gove Bush a blowjob so we can impeach him?!?!"
BIll Maher
 
Last edited:
waka said:
Do SW pilots have to wear the flag tie? It seems like that's all I see lately.

No one died when Clinton lied? I don't normally get into politcal arguments online, but this quote is just too harebrained for me to let it go unanswered. You realize that Clinton had the power to kill Bin Laden before 9/11, but sat on his ass and didnt? How many lives was that? And I'm sick of the left skewing the view on the Iraq war. This is one of the most successful wars we have fought. Not that each and every life isn't important, but we've lost ten times that number in single days in other wars! Get your !$@% facts right before you post some idiotic, half baked MORON tag line online.
 
Alex429595 said:
No one died when Clinton lied? I don't normally get into politcal arguments online, but this quote is just too harebrained for me to let it go unanswered. You realize that Clinton had the power to kill Bin Laden before 9/11, but sat on his ass and didnt? How many lives was that? And I'm sick of the left skewing the view on the Iraq war. This is one of the most successful wars we have fought. Not that each and every life isn't important, but we've lost ten times that number in single days in other wars! Get your !$@% facts right before you post some idiotic, half baked MORON tag line online.
When you start thinking on your own instead of regurgitating what is spoonfed to you by someone else, then I'll have an intelligent discussion with you. Until then, you'll win every moron-athon.
 
Last edited:
TR4A said:
Let us know when you interview so we can write a letter for you.

It sounds like that you have deluded yourself by thinking that you have a claim to some sort of consensus. If you're empowered by a message board on the internet, go ahead, be my guest.

"The expression of insecurity is certainly not driven by intent"

R Galpith
 
waka said:
When you start thinking on your own instead of regurgitating what is spoonfed to you by someone else, then I'll have an intelligent discussion with you. Until then, you'll win every moron-athon.

No one spoon-fed me.

Remember those little Tea Parties Bill hosted in Somalia, Bosnia, and Yugoslovia? I was there. And what about the USS Cole? We lost lots of good people while Bill was busy getting a hummer in the Oral Office.
 
SMOE said:
No one spoon-fed me.

Remember those little Tea Parties Bill hosted in Somalia, Bosnia, and Yugoslovia? I was there. And what about the USS Cole? We lost lots of good people while Bill was busy getting a hummer in the Oral Office.

So what? One has nothing to do with the other. Using your logic (or lack thereof) Bush Junior had taken more vacations than any other president. So while he's basking in is own glory on his ranch lining the pockets of his contributors through no bid contracts, soldiers are dying in Iraq for his lies.
 
waka said:
So what? One has nothing to do with the other. Using your logic (or lack thereof) Bush Junior had taken more vacations than any other president. So while he's basking in is own glory on his ranch lining the pockets of his contributors through no bid contracts, soldiers are dying in Iraq for his lies.

Atleast he doesn't get his hair cut while sitting in AF1, while sitting on the ramp of a busy airport, while closing down all traffic at a major airport. And...perhaps if Clinton didnt get his hummer...he would not have needed to divert the American public's attention to Somalia, Bosnia and Yugoslovia. So, I guess a few good people did die when Clinton lied.
 
I'll admit I'm no fan of Clinton and becoming less of a Bush fan every day.

The proof that Bush lied is no stronger or weaker than that Clinton killed Vince Foster. A previous poster was correct when he mentioned that we lost 10x the number of guys in a matter of hours instead of three years. Bottom line every life is valuable and I'd rather fight the terrorists in Iraq than on my soil, not to mention depose a ruthless dictator in the process.

Clinton was a slacker in his responsibilities regarding terror, Clinton's admin propped up a smoke and mirrors economy. Bush is sidestepping immigration and not fighting to win, but rather fighting not to lose (ask anyone who runs a prevent defense in football how that works out.)

If i'm a kool-aid drinking rightwing nut, then you are a left wing nut and oh well. best of luck to ya.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top