Nothing discussed here would have been preventable in the failed TA. It would all have been allowed under the exception provisions. F9/Lynx were the reasons for these exceptions. Sheared, you don't even know what you voted yes on!
shootr
It still amazes me that you guys didn't understand the TA.
The TA had a specific exclusion for what now appears to be Frontier, but it was phrased such that the company could buy them (and Lynx) and be restricted from growing either. So we could have the exact scenerio we have today, but there could be no growth of the Q400 or Airbus fleet to take over our flying. Also, there was to be no domestic codeshare, so they couldn't take over our routes.
Now under the current contract you guys are paying $1,000 per month to keep, there is no restriction on growing either Frontier or Lynx, there is no restriction on any codeshare, domestic or international and SL32 is null if we grow by a certain number of hulls, which again, I don't feel like looking up, since Frontier is bigger than that number. It does NOT state Boeings.
So by turning down the contract, you voted to allow SWA to grow a new subsidiary if they want to, to code share under our name.
We are certainly worse off with this purchase with the current contract in place than we would have been with the TA in place, because of the much stricter language regarding domestic codeshare and limiting the growth of RJ subsidiaries.
But then again, I actually read the whole contract. You? Apparently you listened to the lances. Who got to keep their paycheck while you write a check for $1,000 each month back to the company.