Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Airlines schedules its first flights in Memphis

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hey, good ole Hardcrr started it, and I ended it. He made a decision, and he'll have to live with it. He may be happy, or maybe he won't be. Choice is good, except when you make a poor one.

From 2020-2024 there will be over 4000 pilots retiring at DL, in just 5 years. What will the numbers be at SWA during that period? He should have looked at that, and he should have tried something other than the MD88. Oh well.


Bye Bye---General Lee

Too bad you won't be able to enjoy any of it, since you aren't even a pilot, much less on the DAL seniority list.
 
PBR,

The big question is, which is it? Layover in Twin Falls or Idaho Falls for you tonight? Will "Uncle" Stan Nonrev out for your 9 hour layover? That's awesome. Awwwwww! You are the hardest working Brasilia FO out there.



Bye Bye---General Lee
Come on Genny, get some new material, BTW what's wrong with TWF or IDA?
This just illustrates just how out of touch you are, since you aren't even a pilot, much less on the DAL list.
Nice try though! Even an EMB F/O outranks you since he is actually flying 121, whereas you are just dry humping a blow up doll....
 
Come on Genny, get some new material, BTW what's wrong with TWF or IDA?
This just illustrates just how out of touch you are, since you aren't even a pilot, much less on the DAL list.
Nice try though! Even an EMB F/O outranks you since he is actually flying 121, whereas you are just dry humping a blow up doll....


I spit my beer out. :)
 
Come on Genny, get some new material, BTW what's wrong with TWF or IDA?
This just illustrates just how out of touch you are, since you aren't even a pilot, much less on the DAL list.
Nice try though! Even an EMB F/O outranks you since he is actually flying 121, whereas you are just dry humping a blow up doll....

Emb FO PBR,

There is a lot more to the World than IDA and TWF, although "Uncle" Steve wants you to stay put at his place. (You probably want to stay "out of touch.")

Face it, you are a burned out regional FO with no way to get away from your friend or your airline. You obviously lack a college degree, so it looks like you and Steve will remain put in TWF, and if you enjoy it, then good for you two.



Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Emb FO PBR,

There is a lot more to the World than IDA and TWF, although "Uncle" Steve wants you to stay put at his place. (You probably want to stay "out of touch.")

Face it, you are a burned out regional FO with no way to get away from your friend or your airline. You obviously lack a college degree, so it looks like you and Steve will remain put in TWF, and if you enjoy it, then good for you two.



Bye Bye---General Lee
Obvious? More post grad work than I like to think about. That makes the observations about you, all the more accurate. You chose not to go to the other thread about the 76 systems, because in fact if you were to post some of your half baked "ideas" about the systems, you would be exposed for what you are, a pimply faced, booger eating, goober living in your moms basement. Now climb back on to the blow up doll and give it another try.

Here ya go:
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=153001
I expect you will decline to weigh in, and that omission will indict you.
 
Last edited:
Obvious? More post grad work than I like to think about. That makes the observations about you, all the more accurate. You chose not to go to the other thread about the 76 systems, because in fact if you were to post some of your half baked "ideas" about the systems, you would be exposed for what you are, a pimply faced, booger eating, goober living in your moms basement. Now climb back on to the blow up doll and give it another try.

Here ya go:
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=153001
I expect you will decline to weigh in, and that omission will indict you.

I didn't even read that thread originally, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. I usually read threads that interest me. Looking at it and reading the responses, NWAF16dude made a good retort, but Flyboyike also made a good point that the LOT 767 that landed gear up in Warsaw informed their own mx people about the problem just after TO from EWR, and nothing could be done, even across the Atlantic. Sometimes things just happen, like Steve's affinity for you. It makes no sense, but if it works, then great!


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
I didn't even read that thread originally, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. I usually read threads that interest me. Looking at it and reading the responses, NWAF16dude made a good retort, but Flyboyike also made a good point that the LOT 767 that landed gear up in Warsaw informed their own mx people about the problem just after TO from EWR, and nothing could be done, even across the Atlantic. Sometimes things just happen, like Steve's affinity for you. It makes no sense, but if it works, then great!


Bye Bye---General Lee

Nice try, since you have no real knowledge of the systems on the 767, you dodge the question/issue. Once the subject matter goes deeper than the first page on a Google search, you flameout!
 
Nice try, since you have no real knowledge of the systems on the 767, you dodge the question/issue. Once the subject matter goes deeper than the first page on a Google search, you flameout!

I did my type ride on the 757/767 twelve years ago, and these days our recurrent orals consist of 1 page of limitations, 1 half page of memory items, and walk around slides. Ask Bill Lumburg or Googles Pisano, they also are on the 7ER. I don't really delve into systems as much as you have to apparently. We have a 1 hour CD covering "some" specific systems, but again they don't ask us. If there are problems enroute, you can consult the QRH, or Maintenance directly via ACARS, or even call ATL Radio and have a phone patch. Standard stuff for legacy pilots. (You wouldn't know, probably never know) Ask any supposed DL guy on this board. You and Steve lose......



Bye Bye---General Lee
 
I did my type ride on the 757/767 twelve years ago, and these days our recurrent orals consist of 1 page of limitations, 1 half page of memory items, and walk around slides. Ask Bill Lumburg or Googles Pisano, they also are on the 7ER. I don't really delve into systems as much as you have to apparently. We have a 1 hour CD covering "some" specific systems, but again they don't ask us. If there are problems enroute, you can consult the QRH, or Maintenance directly via ACARS, or even call ATL Radio and have a phone patch. Standard stuff for legacy pilots. (You wouldn't know, probably never know) Ask any supposed DL guy on this board. You and Steve lose......



Bye Bye---General Lee
Bill and Googles,
Nice dodge, zit boy, no matter what you say, the truth will set you free, you aren't a 121 pilot, never have been, never will be! Keep playing though.
Even an EMB F/O has something you will never have, 121 time in their logbook. So you are saying that the DAL 767 type requires 1/2 page of memory items, a 1 hour CD and a page of limitations, sounds like you would be done before lunch on the first day......
 
Last edited:
Anymore questions Slaquer about how to get 120 INTL hours in a month? You're welcome....

Bye Bye---General Lee


I still do no think you fly for DAL, but you did explan it better than any of my buds at DAL. They actually do not even know how to do it , just that it can be done . They fly about 80 hr a motth . They are not able to pick up any extra flying .
 
I still do no think you fly for DAL, but you did explan it better than any of my buds at DAL. They actually do not even know how to do it , just that it can be done . They fly about 80 hr a motth . They are not able to pick up any extra flying .

The more senior you are in category, the better chance you have to swap a turn or 2 day for a bigger, more high time trip that can add up. All you have to do is "have something to swap", and then seniority takes over.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
I didn't even read that thread originally, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. I usually read threads that interest me.
I'm curious, why does anything concerning Southwest generate so much of your interest. I know why I click on them, because I work there, but conversely; I generally skip over threads about airlines I don't work for.
 
The more senior you are in category, the better chance you have to swap a turn or 2 day for a bigger, more high time trip that can add up. All you have to do is "have something to swap", and then seniority takes over.


Bye Bye---General Lee

I guess your seniority(on a list of one), allows you to climb on to the blow up doll when ever you want to, thats the only trip you will ever get....
 
I'm curious, why does anything concerning Southwest generate so much of your interest. I know why I click on them, because I work there, but conversely; I generally skip over threads about airlines I don't work for.

He's been pissed about Southwest for years.

Mostly likely..

1. SW stability thru 9/11.
2. Higher pay than DL for many years.
3. Higher productivity with high payrates at SW vs DL
4. No RJs vs almost a thousand at DL recently
5. Quick upgrades over that past 10 years.
6. DL bankruptcy

Your right Howard, I don't mind taking a look at other airline threads just to stay informed with the industry. But I don't (and most other pilots) don't inject themselves into OAL threads like this guy does. It's idiotic and bizarre.
 
I still do no think you fly for DAL, but you did explan it better than any of my buds at DAL. They actually do not even know how to do it , just that it can be done . They fly about 80 hr a motth . They are not able to pick up any extra flying .
You can get over 100 credit hours a month via swap with the pot or straight pick ups off the swap board. GL doesn't say that all airline pilots, ie 121 can't fly over 1000 block per year.
 
I'm curious, why does anything concerning Southwest generate so much of your interest. I know why I click on them, because I work there, but conversely; I generally skip over threads about airlines I don't work for.


I didn't think "Ooops, the CB popped" or whatever seemed all that interesting. But, PBR did, and he was ALL OVER IT.

I do read threads concerning the legacies, and most of them in the Majors board. I enjoy all parts of this industry, and that makes some people mad. I enjoy the debate and giving opinions on FI, and if I do it in the Regionals, Cargo, LCCs, Foreign Airlines, or Majors section, some people are threatened by that. (ie PBR) A girl like that knows she can't debate, and resorts to attempted slams that have no affect whatsoever. But yes, I do look at other sections, and pick and choose which threads I want to read.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
He's been pissed about Southwest for years.

Mostly likely..

1. SW stability thru 9/11.
2. Higher pay than DL for many years.
3. Higher productivity with high payrates at SW vs DL
4. No RJs vs almost a thousand at DL recently
5. Quick upgrades over that past 10 years.
6. DL bankruptcy

Your right Howard, I don't mind taking a look at other airline threads just to stay informed with the industry. But I don't (and most other pilots) don't inject themselves into OAL threads like this guy does. It's idiotic and bizarre.

No, that's not really it. There is no doubt SWA was stable through 9-11 and the resulting BKs, but what I saw was arrogance. Sure, the same could be said about other groups too (ahem, ahem), but this one was just plain obvious. When I tried to figure out why, it still wasn't clear to me. I think SWA is a well run company, and most of the employees seem nice, and for a long while management had a great relationship with the employees, which was enviable. But, when I gave my opinion that I wouldn't want to do that type of flying (25 min turns, multiple leg days, and on one plane type forever), I was slammed by everyone. "How could you NOT want what WE HAVE???" "We are awesome...."

Now, I can already see how this will be turned around at me. I simply throw out there that there is ANOTHER option, one that many on here don't understand. Sure, they USED TO FLY MAC back in the day and HATED INTL flying..... But, that simply is not the same. I point out that legacies have a choice to do domestic or INTL, and that many people should consider that before thinking about their next job. No biggie. SWA flying is different than legacy flying. (not really hub and spoke vs point to point....etc) When I point out INTL trips and how much I enjoy them, I again am the villian. Hey, you can't win. I didn't think the AT "merger" was handled very well, and that brought me some slack, but I try to call it like I see it. I still think SWA is a great company, but just not one I would prefer to fly for. I enjoy what I do, and I enjoy having plane/trip options. Others don't care. Oh well.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
I'm curious, why does anything concerning Southwest generate so much of your interest. I know why I click on them, because I work there, but conversely; I generally skip over threads about airlines I don't work for.
simple pandering, if he only stuck to his threads he would only have one percent of his post total.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top