lindsaya99
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Posts
- 219
OK, Guys, once again-
What we really need is a Guild . . . . . one that says "From this day forward, no Pilot will operate a B___ aircraft for less than $___. per hour.
Your existing union is still your union, but they cannot negotiate any pay rates below the rate set by the national Guild.
This way, the issue of pilot pay is "off the table". It cannot be used as a competitive advantage any longer.
.
I like that idea except that instead of the payscale being based on the aircraft type it should be based on the seating capacity. CRJ 100/200/700/900/1000 are all the same type and therefore would be the same payscale. Obviously we want to avoid that. This becomes especially critical when the lines between Majors and Regionals begin to blur around the 100 seat mark. Compass E190s vs. NWA DC-9s, USAir E190s vs. Mesa CRJ900s. If payrates are determined on a per seat basis then the regionals would lose their cost advantage (at least as far as pilots are concerned).