Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
maybe those are the duds that shouldn't be flying for a living and couldn't pass the 1/2 dozen eval/interviews they've had prior to being hired... who knows?
There is such a thing as a pilot who has no business flying tho, we all know them... sad thing is this profession has a hard time getting rid of weak performers for some reason.... don't see this happening with Doctors, and certainly not surgeons.
Looking back, my experience in hiring these guys who fly the single pilot piston twins, like the Airnet pilots, is that almost without exception they are very good instrument pilots. They fly raw data in the clouds at night, non-precision instrument approaches into uncontrolled airports. Some of the weaker inst. pilots I have seen come out of the modern turbine airplanes with all the automation, coupled capability, and FMS technology.Yip adds interesting opinons and perspective to these conversations. Don't bash him just because you don't like what he is saying.
Sadly, this is not really the case... I used to fly around a couple of surgeons that actually made a really good living correcting the botched surgeries previously done by other surgeons. In fact they were extremely busy, and had more cases than they could handle.
Looking back, my experience in hiring these guys who fly the single pilot piston twins, like the Airnet pilots, is that almost without exception they are very good instrument pilots. They fly raw data in the clouds at night, non-precision instrument approaches into uncontrolled airports. Some of the weaker inst. pilots I have seen come out of the modern turbine airplanes with all the automation, coupled capability, and FMS technology.
Ever think of what is going to happen if you are on the tail end of the hiring?
People in training now are not going to be able to go from zero hours to 1500 to regional airline captain to majors on less than 10 years. We are already seeing 5 year plus upgrades at the regionals. Figure 2 years min to go from zero to 1500. 5 years to upgrade. 2-3 years as captain to get hired at a major. 10 years give or take.
Those who are starting today are going to be very disappointed at the time it will take to "make it".
Looking back, my experience in hiring these guys who fly the single pilot piston twins, like the Airnet pilots, is that almost without exception they are very good instrument pilots. They fly raw data in the clouds at night, non-precision instrument approaches into uncontrolled airports. Some of the weaker inst. pilots I have seen come out of the modern turbine airplanes with all the automation, coupled capability, and FMS technology.
Agreed to some extent, but it all depends on what you mean by "instrument pilots." It sounds like your definition is "ability to fly raw data with round dials and old technology."
Of course the guys who fly that way on a regular basis are better at flying round dials. It would take me a minute to warm up to a DC9. It would take a DC9 pilot a minute to warm up to an FMS and glass airplane too. However, I don't think that it means that I'm not as good at instrument flying. I'm very good at flying instruments in the aircraft for which they pay me to fly (EMB 190). If I start getting paid to fly a DC9, I'll learn that plane, and be just as good in that equipment.
Pilot Shortage, Blah, Blah, Blah, Pilot Shortage, Blah Blah Blah.
Show me the money! I've been hearing the junk since 1999.
Buzz Saw
I understand that you are passing this on, but I do have to question the logic here. Are all low time pilots excellent, but then become poor performers the more experience they get? If so, will hiring <800 hour pilots mean they will become poor performers between 900-1500 hours at the regional? Or do they only lose brain capacity while teaching others how to fly? How does this work?