Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Sent home - electronic logbook

  • Thread starter Thread starter zuka
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 16

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
phishhman said:
I agree. I spoke with a few freinds that had done some interviewing here and they want the original pen-and-ink loogbooks because one could just change flight times and reprint the page, undetected.
What?? Do you have some sort of special "detector" watching you when you fill in your paper logbook? If an interviewer really told you this he is a moron.
 
I suppose that if the entries are written in ink, which most folks with written logs use, it would be difficult for one to make changes to that later without it being fairly obvious. On the other hand, an e-logbook wouldn't be so difficult to change. I have nothing against e-logbooks, I own one myself. Even so, I keep a written log as well just in case I need it. It takes a little extra time to log each day's flights in both places, but its worth it for the peace of mind.
 
Hired with spreadsheet logbook

I was hired by both Eagle and XJET with an excel spreadsheet logbook, printed and each page signed. Original endorsements were scanned and pasted into the sheets and are as good as the originals. If it meets the requirements and also looks good....it is a plus not a minus. Even Dawn Daniel was impressed.
 
Been using a electronic log since 1994 and had no problems with the couple of interviews I attended with it. The log is printed out and in a smart binder. Each page is signed and also has a print date stamp on it so you could easily see if it has been rigged. Hell I haven't even made a written log book entry for over 10 years and went to a PDA from the "red book" 4 years ago and sync it straight up with my PC.

To be nit picky, the only log entries you really need to have is to show currency on the type of aircraft being flown, nothing more is required.

I fail to see how a written logbook is less easy to "doctor" than an electronic one. Anyone with to much time on their hands can pencil fly to their hearts content.
 
I suppose that if the entries are written in ink, which most folks with written logs use, it would be difficult for one to make changes to that later without it being fairly obvious.
Why would a guy that was pencil whipping his logbook change an entry versus just adding an entry no way to detect that.
 
changing paper

I saw a student pilot once training for his commercial and had some things in his logbook that were questionable. He just brought a new logbook and rewrote all the entries. It's easy to do. He had about 250 hours so it wasn't that many pages to redo. I'm not sure how he handled the instructor endoresments, perhaps he got his instructor to resign a few pages. It's more work, but you can still change it.
 
Folks,

I think the watchwords here are; attention to detail. I don't think Express Jet or anyone else for that matter cares WHAT form your logbooks are in as long as they are truthful, neat, legible and complete. I have a different 2" binder for every year starting in 1998. These are divided into months, with a green logbook total page with signature for each month. Underneath the totals page are copies of each aircraft logsheet from every trip I flew. It's all there, where we went, who signed for the airplane, write-ups, all of it. While I got some grief and ribbing over the size of my logbooks, (They filled one of those Simuflite tote bags) I was still offered the job, because they were neat, truthful, legible and complete.
 
I've used an Excel spreadsheet as an electronic logbook for several years now. Every few months or so, when I have an afternoon with nothing to do, I'll transcribe all the entries into one of those big professional paper logbooks, which also contain all my check-offs and endorsements.

When I interviewed at XJT, they gave me grief because for about two year's worth of entries, I never totalled the times on the bottom of each page (I did sign the pages, though). I never felt it necessary to do that since I had a running total on my spreadsheet. I did put the totals on the last page so they could tell how much time I had. When they questioned me why my logbook was "incomplete" I told them about the spreadsheet. One of the interviewers asked if I had the spreadsheet with me. I didn't but offered to email it to him, at which he chuckled and said "that's alright."

Well, as you can tell by my profile, I got the job.

I will say that most of my time came from a well-established Part 135 check hauler and I don't think they doubted my time or my experience, which was reflected in the way they asked me questions vs. guys with mostly Part 91 backgrounds.

They just want to be able to quickly and easily analyze your time, which means giving it to them on paper. Whether it is in a paper logbook or clean printouts from an electronic logbook shouldn't matter.
 
Mesa doesn't accept computerized logbooks

Traveled to Phoenix to interview with Mesa last week. Got sent home because they would only accept original, handwritten logbooks, not the Excel spreadsheet I've used as a log for the last three years. They actually want me to copy every entry over by hand, then come back to complete the interview.

This, of course, transpired only *after* they collected their $50 "application fee".
 
Lord_Baltimore said:
Traveled to Phoenix to interview with Mesa last week. Got sent home because they would only accept original, handwritten logbooks, not the Excel spreadsheet I've used as a log for the last three years. They actually want me to copy every entry over by hand, then come back to complete the interview.

This, of course, transpired only *after* they collected their $50 "application fee".
Just having a computerized logbook is rarely good enough. Did you have the entire logbook printed out and each page signed? If you did they should not have sent you home. If not it does not meet the minimum requirements of most airlines.
 
Lord_Baltimore said:
Traveled to Phoenix to interview with Mesa last week. Got sent home because they would only accept original, handwritten logbooks, not the Excel spreadsheet I've used as a log for the last three years. They actually want me to copy every entry over by hand, then come back to complete the interview.

This, of course, transpired only *after* they collected their $50 "application fee".
Well when I interviewed at Mesa in February I took my computer-printed logbook to the interview along with my original handwritten logs with the endorsements in them (the handwritten logs were not up-to-date). As with the other 2 airlines I interviewed at, the logbooks were a hit. Definitely scored points on that one. No one even wanted to see the handwritten logs.

Ray
 
Lear70 said:
The only way I can see an electronic version being better is if you use a PDA and transfer it directly into your laptop or home computer's electronic log, thereby eliminating the need to copy your times twice.
At SkyWest, we are able to download our times directly from the company intranet to personal computer and/or PDA. It's very slick. All I have to keep track of is landings and IMC (I just write these down on the paper printout of my schedule that I carry with me, and enter them after I download the week's flying). It takes care of the rest. Updating my logbook once a week takes a couple minutes.

The electronic logbooks make it all worthwhile if you ever have to fill out an 8710 or another airline application. It can tell you how much night-multi-turbine-PIC-IMC-xcountry you have in seconds vs. possibly a very long time adding by hand.
 
So, if you don't sign your handwritten logbook is that a big deal? I mean, I wrote it all in, what's the point of signing each page in addition? Am I lying if I didn't sign it or something?
 
pkjohnsonm said:
I have read about several people who have been sent home with their e-logbooks. Apparently the only reason is that the pages were not signed. That is just what I have read.
Show me anywhere in the FAR's that it says you have to sign your logbook. I had this come up years ago at a FISDO and they could not show me where you have to sign anything.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom