Skyline said:
OK, Lets just keep the current check ride system the same and focus on the point style bidding system. Then everyone would be free to choose just what they wanted. Perhaps its money and they would fly 27 days a month from the most hated base as an FO. Maybe you want a quick upgrade and can bid for a bad base and lower pay to get it. Others could have QOL but sacrifice in upgrade and have to spend some days in the office working on other things like scheduling. It would be a holistic approached aimed at getting everyone a little of what they want instead of just a few getting it all.
Skyline
How on earth would a company using a system like that be able to keep up with the required training and currency requirements? In a corporate flight department that may be feasible. When you start talking about 500 airplane fleets and 6000 to 10,000 pilots, something like that becomes a scheduling nightmare.
I am not sure exactly what QOL issues that you have the most problems with, but I have been on both the top and bottom of seniority lists over the years and when you get down to it, there is not that much difference between the two. Sure reserve bites, and there are cases where folks get stuck on reserve for too long. So a system to alternate reserve months between the lower part of the list, one on one off, might be feasible. But for the most part, a line holder is a line holder. If you think that being senior makes that much difference, you have not been senior anywhere yet!
Even senior, you still miss most of the holidays, birthdays, cookouts etc. I could hold Christmas off, but had to work Thanksgiving, or could get thanksgiving, but have to work Christmas.
Flying is flying, it involves long periods away from home. It is the nature of the beast. When you operate a vehicle that travels thousands of miles on one tank of gas, you have to expect being thousands of miles from home when you land! Some places have better schedules than others, but it sounds like you are looking for something that resembles a 9 to 5 job, that just isn't possible when you operate jets for a living.
You mention sacrificing upgrade for QOL. Many pilots already do this. I have seen dozen of guys pass on upgrade for QOL purposes and wait until they can hold a line as Captain. Not so much at the regionals because the pay sucks so bad. But at the majors, some of the most senior guys are F/O's by choice just to hold a certian base or line of days off.
You want to fix many of the problems that you speak of? Get rid of the crap pay. Doing that is much easier than trying to redefine how an airline runs itself from scheduling to training to fleet managment. Have you ever toured crew scheduling and aircraft tracking at a large carrier? Having a pilot fill in for scheduling would cause a tremendous clusterflop. Even tracking 25 airplanes and where they need to be for the schedule, while making sure they get to where they need to be for the maintenance will make your head throb.
As it stands now, crew scheduling is your best friend!! If they ever truly worked out a purely efficient schedule, they could fire the bottom quarter of the list and never be short of pilots. This is true of every airline I have ever worked at!