Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Scott leather vs Korchmar flight case

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
While I know nothing of the double handle type I do have Korchman with wheels. I've had it for 7 years and the thing has only seen regional service. Its pretty beat right now and figure I've only got 3 or less years left out of the thing. I have had some issues with it, but overall I think its a good bag and I love it.

Issues:
1. Handle fell off a few years ago. Fixed it with some eye bolts, nuts, 250 lb test chain, and plastic tubing cover to make chain handle comfy.

2. The extension handle so you can pull it gets stuck up sometimes. I can always get it down, but now that I fly for a company that does overnights and I carry my overnight bag I no longer need to pull the bag by its wheels so I went ahead and zip tied that handle down so no one uses it anymore.

3. After years of abuse the bottom corners have started to separate, but the holes are small and easily fixed with duct tape on the inside of the bag.

4. Just last week half of one of my "top flaps" came off of the bag. Fixed it with duct tape and have had no problems since.

Good things about the bag:
1. Its survived 7 years in planes such as the 1900, J 41 and EMB 145.

2. Its also survived a few years of commuting

3. I ran it over with my car once. (swore I put it in my trunk, backed up and thud...)

4. Since it has wheels I never ever have to worry about bag drag.

5. Has plenty of room for all of the stuff I need for work.

All in all I'd say its a good bag and would say that you would be hard pressed to find something that can take the same beating and not totally break.
 
If you get the Coyote Works bag and fly an RJ, don't get the 9" one. It's too wide and doesn't fit in the slot. 8" is great though.
 
I have the Scott square 8" bag. I'm on my 4th year now and it's held up well. I can't speak for the other bags but i'm sure they'll work good too.
 
I'm looking into a new bag with the meatl skidplate on the bottom because the bottom corners of my Scott are wearing through from being dragged around on the ramp. If you're a real pilot who uses jetways all the time the leather bottom might work but it's not hard for commuter peons like me to tear them up.
 
8" scott regular handle, 8 yrs no problems other than some drag wear on bottom corners. I will take it into the saddle shop one of these days for some corners.
 
I got a Korchmar (no straps) as my first bag over 12 years ago. I love it!!!! Awesome quality, I paid $200 for it. I have had a little bit of work done to it, new handle, but it is still tough as ever.

I got a second bag as a spare, same style and brand. The new one is very flimsy cheap. Sent it back for handle and latch and the innner board in the lid was broken, they did not fix it. It is junk!!!! So, now i have nothing good to say about Korchmar. But, the straps would make it more durable.
 
I am sure there are a lot of great bags out there but I must say this about the Scott customer service. I have a bag that was damaged by heat (back of my vehicle where hot exhaust was being pumped directly on the scott bag unknown to me for a couple bags). The leather on the bottom corner on two sides cracked and I was pissed! I informed the company saying their leather was substandard, we talked, I sent the bag in, they repaired it and sent it back to me and did a great job. By this time I found out about my exhaust and thanked them for helping me with my bag. It is still in great shape and I know my handles will never break like so many of the other bags, those leather straps are tough.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom