I'm still wondering if anyone really thinks what he said was very different than the below imagined statement - and if so, would that below statement have been acceptable? Keep in mind, this is a publicly traded company bound by equal opportunity laws, and not a church.
"I am gravely concerned for those of you who have not accepted Jesus. Only through accepting Him may you find salvation. Millions across the world who have not found Him are lost to the eternal fires of he11 each year and this is perhaps life's greatest tragedy."
And for those of you who actually have written here that BB was well within his rights and in no way out of line to write this on the Company Update forum... put the shoe on the other foot and see if you're being honest with yourself... Imagine BB coming out strongly and aggressively Pro-Choice, stating that that should absolutely drive who we vote for during the election and stating that a woman's choice to do what she may with her body is the most fundamental of rights. If that makes you feel angry, then YOU should also agree that BB was WAY out of line to ever broach the subject.