Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republic to Fly for Midwest

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Who wants to bet that these 170s willl never be flown by pilots on our seniority list. A year or two from now Midwest Airlines will cease to exist and Midwest Connect will be the only Midwest flights in the air.

If there is no Midwest, why would there be a Midwest Connect?
 
Quote:
TheJCNIs
I feel that any Republic pilots flying any B717 routes under the Midwest name as SCABS! Tell your management, no way to this scab flying. This lable is something you don't want. Quote.

I am sorry, but as a Midwest pilot I will be the first to say that I don't consider Republic pilots as scabs and think they have nothing to do with this, its our own management crap that we need to worry about, please don't use the "S" word when it really doesn't apply, the "S" word loses its effect when you do that.
 
Last edited:
sorry for my post. It was a knee jerk reaction. It shows how scope is so important. Sorry to the republic pilots being dragged into this.
 
sorry for my post. It was a knee jerk reaction. It shows how scope is so important. Sorry to the republic pilots being dragged into this.

Believe me I know how you feel, its my 3rd furlough, we are all very outraged, we just need to point our outrage toward the right people.

Oh by the way, we all can thank Scotty for the great scope (or lack of) we currently have.
 
Last edited:
D. Scope
1. This Agreement covers the company, any subsidiary of the
company, the company’s parent, any subsidiary of the
company’s parent and any future airline certificate(s) created as
a subsidiary of the company or subsidiary of the company’s
parent.
2. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all present and
future flying (including that international flying which originates
or terminates within the United States or its possessions) and all
charters, ferry flights (not including ferry flights of newlyacquired
aircraft prior to being placed in revenue service),
training flights, test flights, (except test flights assigned to
management), or other utilization of aircraft owned or leased by
the company, the company’s parent or any subsidiary of the
company or subsidiary of the company’s parent shall be
performed by pilots on the Chautauqua Airlines Pilots’ System
Seniority List in accordance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement or any other applicable agreement between the
company, the company’s parent or any subsidiary of the
company’s parent and the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, Airline Division.
3. The Company, Subsidiary of the Company, the Company’s
Parent or Subsidiary of the Parent shall not establish any new
airline (alter ego or otherwise) or acquire a controlling interest in
any carrier whether directly or through the Parent or another
Subsidiary of the Parent, and maintain it as a separate carrier.
A “Controlling Interest” or “Control” means the ownership of an
equity interest representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the
outstanding capital stock of an entity or voting securities
representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting
power of outstanding securities then entitled to vote generally in
the election of such entity’s board of directors or other governing
body.
4. The Company will not transfer aircraft, or operating authority to
its Parent, a Subsidiary of the Parent, or to a Subsidiary of the
Company for the purpose of evading the terms of this
Agreement. The Company will also not establish a third party
leasing device to evade the terms of this agreement.


Like how our management enters into a lease deal in direct violation of our CBA and the CEO cheerleading the good this is going to be for the two companies. This deal blows and both pilot groups are to suffer as upper managment irons out the details of the golden parachutes.
 
Last edited:
"I've given up trying to understand what is going on here. Why would you operate 9 717's?"

Or there is another plan in the background and 9 717's is the bare necessity to maintain capacity and or ME could only afford to operate 9 airframes and stay out of BK.

Call me crazy, but if you look at some of the players involved here (TPG, Replublic/Wexford) I do not think it is completely out of the question for dozens of airbus to be operated out of MKE with FR tailnumbers after the beginning of the year. Problem is, F9 and YX pilots probably won't be flying them. Total bs flightinfo speculation, but things are going to come to a head in MKE and DEN soon and the same people are pulling the equity strings.

Sorry to all of the gents at ME. Yet another great group of guys takes one on the chin. Walking away from this goat-roap is getting easier by the day.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top