601Pilot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2001
- Posts
- 338
I agree. There will be a lot more E-170s heading to someone besides CMR ormichael707767 said:I can't figure out why anyone is shocked by this. Did you think the company asked for the changes in definition of a 70 seater which would allow the E-170 just for grins? Did you really think they would add another fleet type at ASA and or CMR, even if you are cheaper than CHQ? Did you think they would add to our debt to add the E-170 when CHQ or someone like them could do it and the debt is theirs not Delta's? Did you think Delta would not continue to add to the DCI arsenal to spread the flying and minimize the risk of a strike? Did you think something like this would not happen while ASA was in contract talks?
Anyone who is surprised by this move is either a fool or just doesn't pay attention to whats going on.
Let me add to the ASA and CMR guys, if you think it will end with 16 E-170s at CHQ, you are kidding yourself. And for the Delta guys, if you think it will end with the E-170, you are also kidding yourself.
ASA. I'll be surprised if we (ASA) actually receive all 25 a/c we are scheduled
to receive in `05. The possibility of a strike at ASA is gaining momentum by the
day, especially with all the company rhetoric being spewed. I'm assuming we
will have a strike vote within 6 months if the current pace of negotiations is
maintained. That will have a big impact on a/c deliveries and flight allocation.
If, God forbid, we go on strike for 90 days, the financial impact to DAL would
definitely pull them into Ch. 11. I have no doubt that the loss would be close to
$1 billion due to the increase in flying scheduled for Feb. 1st.