Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Regional Pilots Kill 228 People by Pulling up After Stall Warning

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
How does that work out when you have a blocked pitot tube? Perhaps the pilots were getting an increasing speed (performance) indication with an ever increasing altitude and pitch attitude. That sure would be confusing when you're flying at night, in severe turbulence at 4 am in you home time zone.

The whole point of pitch and power is that airspeed (blocked pitot) is out of the equation. They lost this parameter. Therefore, reliance on increasing airspeed indication is moot.

Pitch and power will equal performance (safe airspeed).

The backup gyro and thrust settings might have paid dividends.
 
The whole point of pitch and power is that airspeed (blocked pitot) is out of the equation. They lost this parameter. Therefore, reliance on increasing airspeed indication is moot.

Pitch and power will equal performance (safe airspeed).

The backup gyro and thrust settings might have paid dividends.

As far as I've heard airspeed was the only thing erroneous or missing. Strange for a professional pilot to be staring at 40 degrees nose up and still pulling back on the stick
 
We cannot yet determine from the evidence that has presented that the crew responded incorrectly. However, it does point out that there is too much reliance upon automated systems that not only aren't 100% reliable, but create a dangerous loss of basic airmanship skills that isn't being compensated for by increasing training requirements for basic instrument skills and airmanship. Unfortunately, not enough people have died yet for things to change...

The new requirements should require that all pilots have to have "hand flown the beech" 1900 where pilots are born and aviators made. Write your senators!!
 
In an Airbus, the thrust levers do not move. I could see how this could happen. About 2 years ago, a Northwest A330 had a similar problem. The thrust rolled back and the airspeed indications dropped to 0. The pilots recognized what was going on quickly, turned off the autothrottles, and set the thrust to pretty close to normal settings. A few minutes later, the airspeed indications came back and they were right on speed. The NWA crew was extremely confused as to what was going on, but they kept the aircraft under control. If the pitot tube was blocked, the airspeed indicator probably started acting like an altimeter (private pilot stuff). The guy starts pulling back, the airspeed goes up, he pulls back more, aircraft stalls. Bad piloting might have been part of the problem, but an unusual acting aircraft started the whole thing.

To the naive regional poster who started this post, karma's a bitch. I hope it never comes back to bite you. I truly mean that.
 
If you were to stay on topic you would note that this AF pilot had 3500 hrs..The question is why did he increase pitch when he was at such a low speed. I think you would note that investigators will ask is it poor training or did he not recognize the situation as a low speed stall for some reason.

Think about it!
It's not how much time he had at the time of the crash but how much he had when hired. If he was hired with only 250 hours TT, most of his time is in cruise, crossing the pond, on autopilot, eating French Toast, and French Fries. How long do you think it takes for a international pilot to accumulate 3250 hours? Four years maybe!?!?
IMHO he was more dangerous as time goes on than when he was first hired.

This is assuming he was hired with the absolute minimums.
 
Last edited:
Think about it!
It's not how much time he had at the time of the crash but how much he had when hired. If he was hired with only 250 hours TT, most of his time is in cruise, crossing the pond, on autopilot, eating French Toast, and French Fries. How long do you think it takes for a international pilot to accumulate 3250 hours? Four years maybe!?!?
IMHO he was more dangerous as time goes on than when he was first hired.

This is assuming he was hired with the absolute minimums.

BINGO!...Airline flying, especially long range airline flying is very mundane and routine. Experience is important...especially teaching, and cargo/charter/multiple cycle short range PIC flying.....Ab Initio straight to a international long range carrier ain't worth squat.

The bigger question is how did they end up in this storm in the first place. Did they know it was there? If not, why not? If they knew it was there, why did they fly into it.
 
BINGO!...Airline flying, especially long range airline flying is very mundane and routine. Experience is important...especially teaching, and cargo/charter/multiple cycle short range PIC flying.....Ab Initio straight to a international long range carrier ain't worth squat.

The bigger question is how did they end up in this storm in the first place. Did they know it was there? If not, why not? If they knew it was there, why did they fly into it.

From the report, they briefed the cabin and each other about wx ahead and started a deviation.
 
From the report, they briefed the cabin and each other about wx ahead and started a deviation.

Yes, but they still ended up penetrating a very large cell...How?

Briefing doesn't mean crap...I want to know how they ended up in this cell.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top