Cleared Direct
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2002
- Posts
- 82
dualrated said:I think the APA "funding" of the flushbacks is through concessions, not through dues money. This has already been funded by our 23% paycut and 2500 additional furloughs (which includes me and G4G5).
You are clearly not informed. Do you even listen to your own hotline? APA discussed this on one of their hotlines earlier this month.
Here is an old May posting that the PDP boys did on it initially when APA first revealed the problem:
________________________
http://www.apapdp.org/pdpblasts/052503.php
PDP Update for Sunday, May 25, 2003
Fellow Pilots,
Many important issues have arisen since the last PDP message. PDP will continue to provide you with information relevant to our industry, our company, and the protection of our careers.
As a new feature, PDP will analyze one aspect of the new contract either through comparison to the old contractual provision or to the contract of another carrier. This week, PDP does a side-by-side comparison of the old PVD (personal vacation day) system versus the new PVD system.
APA BOD Considering Buying Back Supplement W for $10 Million more in Concessions.
PDP has learned that APA leadership may have a case of “buyer’s remorse” regarding changes to Supplement W, the Eagle flowback. Supplement W, had it been left unchanged, would have provided 540 flowback slots for furloughed American Airlines pilots. Due to changes made by the APA BOD during the Tentative Agreement process, the number of flowback slots available is now less than 100, eliminating potential employment for 440 furloughed American Airlines pilots.
There is no doubt that the new flowback procedure represents a substantial concession. While APA leadership has portrayed our current flowback as a furlough mitigation measure and an improvement over the old Supplement W, this is clearly not the case.
We have learned that APA leadership negotiated the new flowback agreement without the approval of the pilots of American Eagle, who were signatories to the original Supplement W. As a result, APA is subject to legal action by ALPA in this matter- legal action that has a significant probability of success.
As a result, APA may attempt to execute the “buyer’s remorse” clause in the contract that would allow us to regain the original Supplement W agreement. APA would have to provide an additional concession worth $10 million to AMR in exchange for the original Supplement W. Exercising the “buyer’s remorse” clause in this matter would be APA’s last opportunity to change the terms of the agreement prior to the amendable date.
American Airlines has provided the APA BOD with a laundry list of concessionary items that they claim is worth $10 million. Note that the concession would not be limited to one year, but would be annual, reducing in amount as the term of the contract progressed.
PDP is concerned that APA leadership failed to execute due diligence in this matter. Correcting this mistake may have the dual consequence of additional concessions as well as the waste of the one-time “buyer’s remorse” clause in our collective bargaining agreement.
_______________________
Since then it has been revealed that the 10 million would only cover the estimated cost to just train the first year of APA pilots at Eagle. This did not include the domino training costs and the following years of training costs. AMR estimates that the total costs will exceed 45 million depending on the exact number that choose to go to Eagle. Get informed.
I guess it boils down to this: If you think that EGL is about to experience big growth and a fleet of 660 jets, then the old Supp. W is good for Eagle pilots, bad for AA pilots. If you think that Eagle growth will stagnate at the current fleet count, then the old Supp W is good for AA pilots, bad for Eagle.
What it boils down to is the quote TA is not a TA. It is now legal ratified contractual language thanks to your BOD. The only part that is not signed and final is the actual pay rates for the CRJ-700 if it is on the AA certificate, and how to facilitate the disposition of the ALPA "Eagle Rights" captains on the CRJ-700s.
The ratified contractual language allows for APA to change one item in exchange for a concession of equal value. If you want to go back to flowback per Letter 3 it will cost you. AMR was able to get the APA BOD to sign off on something that AA could not even give you. All parties should have sat down and worked out a fair concession for all involved. Instead AA employees ask what concessions did Eagle take while not even inviting them to the concession table. How hypocritical is that?.
I also think that there is plenty of room for more outsourcing to the Connection family..
In addition to being an idiot, you are in complete disagreement with your own union.
Last one to the bottom is a rotten egg!.
And APA is leading the way to the bottom with their latest ratified contractual language. Unfortunately your union has sacrificed you, instead of giving you the contractual right that you had to fly as an RJ Captain at Eagle until recall at AA.
Now you won't even be at the bottom. You will be on the street for a long time.
Last edited: