RAH being underbid??

[TAWS]

The Reverend stated in his weekly sermon that DAL was receiving "low ball bids" from "guys like Trans States, GoJet, Mesa and Pinnacle for both 50 and 76 seat aircraft".

Seems like RAH isn't the biggest bottom feeder on the block! How does it feel boys, to be lumped in with the likes of GoJet? He didn't mention SkyWest, which is odd, because they take so much heat on this board, for being non-union. I guess SkyWest put in a higher bid than the ALPA carriers mentioned above (GoJet being the obvious low-baller).

Have fun, and enjoy swimming even lower than SkyWest AND RAH!

 

[TOOL CRIB]

Or, he could be spewing out mgmt kool-air to get ready for the upcoming contract talks. Now you guys will cost too much.

 

[Smarta$$]

The Reverend stated in his weekly sermon that DAL was receiving "low ball bids" from "guys like Trans States, GoJet, Mesa and Pinnacle for both 50 and 76 seat aircraft".

Seems like RAH isn't the biggest bottom feeder on the block! How does it feel boys, to be lumped in with the likes of GoJet? He didn't mention SkyWest, which is odd, because they take so much heat on this board, for being non-union. I guess SkyWest put in a higher bid than the ALPA carriers mentioned above (GoJet being the obvious low-baller).

Have fun, and enjoy swimming even lower than SkyWest AND RAH!

TOOL.

 

[TAWS]

Or, he could be spewing out mgmt kool-air to get ready for the upcoming contract talks. Now you guys will cost too much.

This is an old one, it's not the first time it's happened. But I'll bet there is a grain of truth to what is being said, it's just funny to see 3 ALPA carriers mentioned, when that union is all about "not lowering the bar" and has even created a "fee for departure taskforce" - what a joke!

 

[TAWS]

Hey Smarta$$,

If you fly for one of these carriers, good luck (I don't troll this board looking to see who people fly for). Nice job raising that bar boys!

 

[snap145]

yes and with the "hostile takeover" of the C gates at CVG, I think its safe to say the 50 seat market is pretty safe for RAH

 

[TAWS]

yes and with the "hostile takeover" of the C gates at CVG, I think its safe to say the 50 seat market is pretty safe for RAH

What do you mean "50 seat market"? It's a 135 base, yeah right!

 

[hbrow15]

Or, he could be spewing out mgmt kool-air to get ready for the upcoming contract talks. Now you guys will cost too much.

Good point, I thought the bid process was confidential how would he know this?

 

[ReverseSensing]

Good point, I thought the bid process was confidential how would he know this?

God probably told him. :nuts:

 

[Baronman]

RAH being underbid?! Time to pray! Please let Delta see the light that is RAH.

 

[LearLove]

its all because of thoes damn j4j guys. they just bring this place down.

 

[snap145]

What do you mean "50 seat market"? It's a 135 base, yeah right!

yes it is a 135 base, but at least 70% of our 80 something daily departures out of there are done on 50 seat airframes...so yeah...right!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[sweptback]

yes and with the "hostile takeover" of the C gates at CVG, I think its safe to say the 50 seat market is pretty safe for RAH

Never say never... ASA was doing that flying just a year ago. Luckily we never opened up a base there, although it is a MX base.

 

[flyer172r]

If it's true, it's not the first time this has happened. TSA's bid on the Continental flying was cheaper than RAH's, but TSA didn't get it.

 

[www.]

yes and with the "hostile takeover" of the C gates at CVG, I think its safe to say the 50 seat market is pretty safe for RAH

You must be new to the game Boy. You might want to remember these words, "Never Say Never." Your flying can go just as fast as it came.