Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Put Down The Laptops and Fly the Plane NWA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"These guys have had 80% of their procedures and policy in their airline get changed over the past few months, plus the way they bid changed very significantly this month."


Read between the lines...The excuses are coming out...The new procedures shouldn't even be a factor unless you are trying to make excuses......

So every time the NTSB investigates an accident, they put out a "probable excuse"?

No, they put out the facts - an "explanation," to use a fancy word I heard somewhere.

Step away from the keyboard.
 
Yup...

No excuses for what they did. They farked up bad... and what's coming to them is coming.

I can see that their explaination (both excuse and explaination start with the same to letters, Joe. They do not mean the same thing. Pull out the webster's next time) is plausible for what was actually going on in the cockpit, though.
 
"These guys have had 80% of their procedures and policy in their airline get changed over the past few months, plus the way they bid changed very significantly this month."


Read between the lines...The excuses are coming out...The new procedures shouldn't even be a factor unless you are trying to make excuses......



It's ok joe. You can admit you were wrong.

You accused Peanuckle of making an excuse as to why they did this. He did no such thing. He was simply saying that the explanation for how this happened was plausible. In other words, believable.

He in no way said it was a valid excuse or justification for their actions.
 
What's getting stupid isn't the media coverage. Who can blame them? These two morons keep changing their story to make this whole situation look more and more egregious each time. First everyone thought they were asleep. Then they said "no, we were in a heated discussion" about company policy. Now they say they were on their laptops. They are progressively making this profession look more and more like a joke with each statement. Tomorrow they're going to say they were mutually masturbating.

The media has multiple goals. Sensationalism and accountability are among them. They found a sensational story, and they want accountability. No thanks to these two d**chebags. It only took a few months for multiple boneheaded incidents to make what Sully did for pilot PR to completely be overshadowed and vanish.

Wait a second. Is that not allowed? Damnit!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top