Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

PSA runs off runway during a aborted takeoff at CRW!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I'm saying real, sterile cockpit in the strictest sense of the "law".

A simple comment such as "nice sunrise" is a violation of sterile cockpit. Let he without sin.....
 
I'm saying real, sterile cockpit in the strictest sense of the "law".

A simple comment such as "nice sunrise" is a violation of sterile cockpit. Let he without sin.....

Where do you draw the line? Maybe bitching about the company is ok? Bitching about the wife is ok? Why don't you just do what your paid to do and be a professional? When the parking brake is set, go ahead blab all you want. When your moving, keep it to business. That is what your being paid for. Grow up. Nobody owes you this. Almost anything that gets missed on a checklist is because of sterile cockpit or not following procedures. I bet you do your flows then do the checklist from memory? That's just a little step away from SOP's right?

" I've been here two years, I should be a Captain" is a reason I've heard why a now 2500 hr. F/O gets complacent. Makes me want to puke.

If you can't do the job like your paid to do it.....Go away, you make us all look bad. That goes for coporate, regional or mainline.

"He without sin"? I've sinned plenty and nearly paid big for it. I learned from my mistakes and try to learn from others that make mistakes. I pride myself when flying anything to do it as close to the way the company, manufacturer and the FAA say I'm supposed to. No flight is perfect but I try every single flight. That's what makes me a professional not some hack doing a half assed job......
 
Last edited:
Another thought is the possible wisdom of always taking off with flaps 20, ala Comair?

When I switched from the 700 to the 200, I realized that not every takeoff was going to be Flaps 8 (except EYW on 700).

I was even lucky enough to have an instructor give me a Weight & Balance scenario in a debriefing that had me switch runways which resulted in a new Faps 20 setting. Point well taken.
 
Which regionals have procedures that specify who inputs the data, sets speeds, crosschecks, etc.? It probably wouldn't matter because most folks can't even get normal checklist responses correct. It ain't that hard, RTFM.
 
maybe the experts are right and we should actually focus more on the job at hand instead of talking on the phone or jibba jabberin to each other during taxi out


That and constantly b1tching about our jobs.....
 
In the spirit of Monday morning quarterbacking, lets discuss what to do if you find yourself in this situation. Without a doubt, they should have caught this earlier.

So, your scenerio is your on takeoff roll at CRW. Your heavy. Cold air temps, clean dry runway. Somewhere between 100kts and your 135ish V1, you discover that the flaps are set at 8 rather than 20. What would you do?

If I was closer to 100kts, I would Discontinue Takeoff Immedietely. If you discover the flap set wrong at closer to V1, I would fly. If my F/O was flying, I would call for the controls and I would keep the aircraft on the ground as long as possible before a slow rotation. Think of it as a windshear recovery with degraded performance.

It sounds like this crew made the decision to continue, but to reset the flaps to 20. As posted above, as soon as they went to 8.1 deg, Master warning and aural "Config Flaps". They probably did not figure on that aural and it caused a second or two to reconsider. That second might have very well brought them above V1. Regardless, it brought them closer to the end of the runway. I think they ended up in the EMAS because they changed their mind. If they had decided to abort first, or not abort after the Config Flaps, I think its safe to say there would be no pics for us to look at or NTSB reports to read.
 
You guys don't have all the facts, why don't you wait for the official report because you cannot be the quarterback on Monday morning unless you know what you are talking aboot... unless of course you want to be a super bowl losing cry baby head shaking peyton manning quarterback.
 
if you look at the pics they moved them to zero rather than 20

US Airways Incident Raises Pilot-Focus Issues

By ANDY PASZTOR
A fundamental breakdown of pilot discipline, including personal conversation in the cockpit, apparently was the major reason a US Airways commuter plane ran off the end of a West Virginia runway last month, according to industry officials.

Now, three weeks after the nonfatal incident, the circumstances are prompting extensive discussion and concern among pilots and safety experts, who consider it the latest example of cockpit distraction and erosion of pilot discipline.

The Jan. 19 event involved a twin-engine Bombardier jet that ran off the runway at Yeager Airport in Charleston, W. Va., after pilots abandoned takeoff. Operated by PSA Airlines Inc., a unit of US Airways Group Inc., the plane was damaged when it smashed into a crushable concrete safety zone at the end of the strip. None of the 34 people aboard was hurt, and the incident has generated relatively little media attention.

But among many safety experts, it is viewed as the latest example of a loss of pilot focus, and a symbol of what some regulators believe is a broader problem of lack of pilot professionalism.

A US Airways spokesman said the airline is cooperating fully with the National Transportation Safety Board's investigation and has launched its own probe. But he declined to comment about specifics. The spokesman also said the two pilots, whose names haven't been released, were placed on administrative leave and taken off flying duties, as is normal after such an event.

PSA Airlines hasn't had a fatal accident or incident since it became part of US Airways, or what was then called USAir, in 1995.

Preliminary data collected from the cockpit voice recorder indicates that prior to the botched takeoff, the two pilots of US Airways Express Flight 2495 engaged in stretches of nonpertinent chatter that didn't deal with flight preparations, checklists or pilot tasks, according to industry officials familiar with the details.

Pilots are strictly prohibited from engaging in such private, extraneous conversations during critical phases of flight, particularly takeoff, descent and landing.

A spokesman for the safety board declined to comment on the investigation.

The board's probe comes at a time when Randy Babbitt, the head of Federal Aviation Administration, is stressing the importance of maintaining pilot professionalism and avoiding distractions behind the controls. Mr. Babbbitt, for example, told a House aviation subcommittee last week that the FAA is looking for methods to transfer the experience of veteran aviators to younger commuter pilots. He said such programs are an "important way to raise professional standards and improve cockpit discipline."

Industry officials describe the following sequence of events on Flight 2495. Before starting the takeoff roll, the crew is believed to have incorrectly set the flaps -- movable panels at the rear of the wings that provide essential lift. As the jet accelerated down the runway, reached almost 100 miles per hour and its front landing gear was lifting off the ground, the crew realized the mistake, according to these officials. The pilots quickly readjusted the flaps, prompting an automated cockpit warning to abandon takeoff. The crew then tried but failed to stop the jet before it rolled into the safety area.

Pilots said it is generally considered unsafe and quite unusual to adjust flap settings during takeoff. Airlines typically train crews to work together to handle so-called rejected takeoffs, including practicing decisions about what speeds and runway conditions make it safer to continue climbing instead of slowing down and attempting to stop.

Write to Andy Pasztor at [email protected]
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top