Please help a fellow union brother not SCAB.

[Diesel]

United we stand-Divided we fall.



That's the easiest way I can describe it to you.



One pilot crossing the line gives management a hard on and let's them know that there are chinks in the armor. Especially if you're two years from a strike and you're already letting them know you'll scab.[/QUOTE



I have NOT said I will scab. In fact, I almost certainly won't.

The company preys on those that are in the "almost" category.

They know that with your vote on the fence they only have to work hard enough to get just you to vote yes.

 

[Roomwithaview]

G4 Dude

There's a union there for a reason.

http://jetcareers.com/forums/threads/how-did-the-netjets-vote-go.56350/page-2

Scan this page for a quick history lesson as to why.

Pay, Bennies, QOL, discipline, termination, and most of all SAFETY are the huge issues that your CB Agent have procured for you over the years. I would think someone that worked at a NETJETS type operation would have a sincere appreciation for having a UNION on property to keep those benefits coming and those detriments at bay.

If you're that "on the fence" then I would say you don't reallly have a very good grasp of what it is your union does for you and even more specifically, what they've done to get you where you are and what they will do should you ever find yourself on the wrong side of a discipline/termination issue.

 

[SWA Bubba]

Bash the coercion all you want, but I'm betting that it's exactly that that has caused you to decide that you'd rather quit. Sounds like mission accomplished to me.

On an completely unrelated-to-Netjets topic, I suspect that I'm not the only member of this board who finds it wildly hilarious that the irony of your comment about "decid[ing] that you'd rather quit" is somehow lost on you, PCL.

Another "mission accomplished"? :blush:

Bubba

 

[G4dude]

On an completely unrelated-to-Netjets topic, I suspect that I'm not the only member of this board who finds it wildly hilarious that the irony of your comment about "decid[ing] that you'd rather quit" is somehow lost on you, PCL.

Another "mission accomplished"? :blush:

Bubba

Why is that ironic?

 

[PCL_128]

I don't think he understands the meaning of the word "ironic."

 

[CA1900]

I want good pay and conditions JUST AS MUCH as the union supporters do. ... Even if I honor the picket line, I would NEVER mistreat a scab, not for a second.

If you would treat a scab with the same respect you'd treat those of us actually working to better this place, then no, you absolutely do NOT want it "just as much" as union supporters do.

 

[G4dude]

If you would treat a scab with the same respect you'd treat those of us actually working to better this place, then no, you absolutely do NOT want it "just as much" as union supporters do.

In your opinion. I actually would respect a scab more than a striker, because he will be trying to help the company survive the strike so we can continue to have our jobs.

 

[Diesel]

In your opinion. I actually would respect a scab more than a striker, because he will be trying to help the company survive the strike so we can continue to have our jobs.

 

[G4dude]

On an completely unrelated-to-Netjets topic, I suspect that I'm not the only member of this board who finds it wildly hilarious that the irony of your comment about "decid[ing] that you'd rather quit" is somehow lost on you, PCL.

Another "mission accomplished"? :blush:

Bubba

Do you mean the irony of being glad that a dues paying member was driven from his job by the hooliganism of the union crazies? If so, I agree with you. This union "brotherhood" stuff is just a lot of rhetorical class warfare cloaking of darker forces at work, namely POWER OVER OTHERS.

 

[jynxyjericho]

In your opinion. I actually would respect a scab more than a striker, because he will be trying to help the company survive the strike so we can continue to have our jobs.

Lol. Oh G4, you crazy crazy guy.