Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To those who think that a strike vote is an act of futility, I ask this:
What else would you do? Throw your hands in the air and resign that you have been foresaken by the airline gods?
Management already has an easy of enough time of taking advantage of their respective employee groups. Why make it any easier for them? A strong showing such as this, albeit inactionable for the time being, will give the management team pause.
Well that and it gave Republic the contract that was supposed to go to ASA, remember the lift for Continental?
I was a NH when this Continental thing was going down, but anyways, our then Prez BL came in and blatently said , "We are exploring options to fly for Continental's available contract." You do not have to, nor will you believe me. But according from the proverbial horse's mouth, the bid was there.
Its a moral booster to the guys flying the line, and with the Bush regime leaving office we airline pilot peons may soon have strike leverage back.
A 99+ strike vote isn't going to change things drastically but it does tell management that even if our pilots are backed into morgages and debt they are fed up enough to become fatalistic about there jobs and strike regardless of their personal finances because this company has sucked the life out of 99+% their employees.
I'm sure you would have rather been negotiating under Clinton........Oh that's right he's the one that HAS blocked an airline strike......How many has Bush blocked? Perhaps do some research rather than just jumping on the anti-republican bandwagon that our illustrious union likes to promote. Any yes many people did vote for Bush. It's called an election.
Any yes many people did vote for Bush. It's called an election.
We at ASA did that 3 years ago, and it didn't do anything except give ALPA some material for their press releases.
yeah just about 49% the first time around, but at least his victory shows that mentally challenged people can still lead successful lives.
Yeh, Kerry would have done such a better job...
Bush is an idiot no doubt, but Kerry wouldn't have done any better..
I love how it always boils down to who is mentally challenged based on who they voted for..
The president is a puppet.. Nothing more, nothing less..
I guess we'll see how Hilary does with the other half of the "mentally challenged" elect her...
I'm sure you would have rather been negotiating under Clinton........Oh that's right he's the one that HAS blocked an airline strike......How many has Bush blocked? Perhaps do some research rather than just jumping on the anti-republican bandwagon that our illustrious union likes to promote. Any yes many people did vote for Bush. It's called an election.
I assume you're referring to the strike of the APA members at AMR. In that case, the block was requested by the unions at AMR. It wouldn't have really been a strike, but rather a lockout. Clinton stopped the lockout as requested. I certainly don't claim that Clinton was a great pro-labor President. In fact, his record was pretty poor (NAFTA anyone?). But, Bush really puts him to shame. Bush has created the most anti-union environment since the beginning of the labor movement. Are you aware that he tried to sneak a bill through Congress that would have designated any striking transportation workers as "terrorists?"I'm sure you would have rather been negotiating under Clinton........Oh that's right he's the one that HAS blocked an airline strike......
How many has Bush blocked?
I wouldn't believe anything management tells you in class in the middle of negotiations and you can count on about 10% of what management says to classes when there are no negotiations. They will tell you things are great when it suits THEIR agenda and tell you things are terrible when it supports THEIR agenda.
The "you guys need to sign the deal we have on the table now so we can get new flying" line has been repeated at every regional airline every time a contract has been negotiated. It's a negotiating tactic and nothing more.
I asked my friend, who is a member in the Operator's Union if he would sign a deal if management told them they would buy a new crane. He said he'd tell them to "go fornicate themselves". I have no idea (well I have some idea) why pilots buy into this line of BS. Until management gives it's right to negotiate lift contracts to ALPA, pilot's won't negotiate for new aircraft.
Are you aware that he tried to sneak a bill through Congress that would have designated any striking transportation workers as "terrorists?"
It gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling, that even as Bush augers the country into the ground, there will be those who still think he's the greatest President in history.
Way to go!
How many rulings from the presidentially-appointed NMB has Bush had to reverse? True, it's zero. That just means that the board clearly understands the administrations guidelines not to release anyone unless a clear strike breaking force is established. (Northwest Mechanics, 2005)
To be honest, your staunch, gun-toting republicanism blows my mind away. You're a regional pilot- Bush most certainly does not care about you and your income level. He cares only for your bosses. Keep that in mind.
. Are you aware that he tried to sneak a bill through Congress that would have designated any striking transportation workers as "terrorists?"
PCL_128 said:As others have said, you don't have to block anything directly when you've appointed the most anti-labor NMB in history. The NMB does all of his wet work for him. That way he doesn't have to take the bad publicity for directly blocking the strikes with a PEB.
The payraise I just got won't cover the increase in taxes I will have to pay under Hillary.....
[George Bush] has never blocked an airline strike...Period. The democratic champion of the past decade (Clinton) did in fact do that.
Collective bargaining is not a constitutional guarantee. I'm not saying it is not a great thing, but it doesn't compare with the guarantees in the bill of rights. We are not slaves, are not held in indentured servitude, and can vote with our feet at any time. The guarantees of our great constitution are on a much higher level written by men whose wisdom exceeds that of our politicians of today by leaps and bounds. As far as faith in our union, I guess I have seen our union fold under the pressure on a predictable basis for well over a decade. I hope it will get better, buy no lowly CEO can take my dignity. The dignity that I cherish in my life goes far beyond the job that I hold. Personal integrity does not start or stop based on my duty time at work. As far as who has been released for self help, I don't have to look beyond my current airline. Only problem was our union blinked first and was afraid to pull the trigger when the time came.I was hoping you'd reply. The only reason Bush hasn't had the opportunity to "shoot down" a strike is that the people that he's appointed to the NMB are doing it for him.
A presidential order that states employees should return to work or not strike is similar to a Governor's pardon- it's a last minute executive intervention.
So to put it simply, this administration's NMB is doing all the dirty work for him. They're that good. None of us can be released, therefore Bush doesn't have to concern himself with overturning an NMB self-help ruling. At least with a Democrat in office, we saw Comair strike in '99. Can you name a pilot group that's been released into self-help since 2000?
One last thing: I completely appreciate your comment about our government being by and for the people. I absolutely agree. Now, take that one step further. When it came to a redressing of issues, namely pilots versus big business, you were completely defeatist about it. "Nothing we can do about it," you said. Shouldn't there be the same feelings about having guns in your home and the powers of collective bargaining? They are, at heart, the same. Each help restore the balance of wealth, power, and dignity from those who would steal and exploit it from you.
Have more faith in the union. Recognize the ones who want to steal your dignity from you.
Collective bargaining is not a constitutional guarantee. I'm not saying it is not a great thing, but it doesn't compare with the guarantees in the bill of rights. We are not slaves, are not held in indentured servitude, and can vote with our feet at any time. The guarantees of our great constitution are on a much higher level written by men whose wisdom exceeds that of our politicians of today by leaps and bounds. As far as faith in our union, I guess I have seen our union fold under the pressure on a predictable basis for well over a decade. I hope it will get better, buy no lowly CEO can take my dignity. The dignity that I cherish in my life goes far beyond the job that I hold. Personal integrity does not start or stop based on my duty time at work. As far as who has been released for self help, I don't have to look beyond my current airline. Only problem was our union blinked first and was afraid to pull the trigger when the time came.
You're a regional pilot- Bush most certainly does not care about you and your income level. He cares only for your bosses. Keep that in mind.
That pretty much sums up the problem with all you raging liberals-you expect, and want, the government to care and then to take care of all your problems. I bet you might even be one of these pilots that collects welfare on the side. End quote.
The issue is not having the government take care of us. However, I would prefer the government not TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY give corporations the upper hand over the people that actually do the work.
There are many issues which will affect our country to a much greater degree and will have a worsening overall impact to our civil liberties, our general social well-being, and our countries financial future.
Don't lecture me about voting for candidates over limited issues. If I remember correctly, 2004 was the "smear the queers" campaign. Issues like gay marriage and abortion have absolutely nothing to do with the purpose of government: infrastructure and defense. Your party was the one that so drastically changed the conversation.
So as we all slip into poverty, you can hold those moral victories of keeping 'dem queers in the shadows. I'd much rather have a decent wage, and let the gays marry. That's an easy trade-off in my book.
And by the way, all this talk about taxes and the ruinous efforts of the Democrats is complete bunk. It is your President that is flushing the dollar in the toilet by bankrolling the entire war effort on the country's credit card. If there is ever a margin call, (which there will be) then the dollar will only be good for starting a fire or wiping your a$$. Great foresight on their part.
Your relative seniority/ experience far exceeds my own. IMHO this is a chance to keep them from being gun shy. All do respect Capt, 99.39% is a big voice to scream to mgmt, and your MEC to stand by what the your pilots are demanding be done.
That pretty much sums up the problem with all you raging liberals-you expect, and want, the government to care and then to take care of all your problems. I bet you might even be one of these pilots that collects welfare on the side.
Remember, our country was founded on the principle of strong local and state government and a smaller, less powerful federal government.
Please don't just vote for a Democrat just because they are pro-union. There are many issues which will affect our country to a much greater degree and will have a worsening overall impact to our civil liberties, our general social well-being, and our countries financial future.
But, if you are going to go DEM . . . Please vote for anyone but Hillary. She's a socialist-nothing more, nothing less.