Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ALPA could have enforced it's merger policy and rejected Bloch's decision as written. The decision violates several stipulations and would not stand up in court, if it does then ALPA has a "Failure to Represent" problem.
But ALPA's goals are:
1. Collect Dues (it is a business after all)
2. Try to keep peace between MECs so it can achieve #1
How do they reject a binding and final decision?
ALPA is a resource. They do not dictate much at all onto the autonomous pilot groups. If national would have dictated DOH onto the pinnacle pilots, they would have screamed bloody murder. They would have complained about the heavy hand of ALPA dictating onto them a policy.
Yet they complain now that it didn't go THEIR way, and that ALPA should have mandated a policy that would have been better for them.
Get real. Pilots don't want policies dictated onto them. Yet when THEIR OWN autonomous group dick$ something up royally, they complain that national didn't fix it for them.
This merger was doomed for pinnacle pilots the moment they forced this to go to binding arbitration by refusing to agree to a reasonable integration through mutual negotiations.
Pinnacle pilots dicked it up, and now bitch that ALPA didn't fix it for them. Yet these are the same guys that would complain if ALPA had forced an integration policy upon them.
Sad.
And I think the MEM Pinnacle guys are talking with their votes considering there were more votes for the Mesaba reps in MEM than there are Mesaba pilots.