All part of the 2012 hiring boom, by 2014 the college degree will no longer define who gets hired.
I agree it is going the way of vocational tech. Doesn't attract the talent/education it once commanded with the former higher pay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All part of the 2012 hiring boom, by 2014 the college degree will no longer define who gets hired.
A college degree has nothing to do with talent in the cockpit. In fact it has little to do with talent in the marketplace. The college degree has become a pay your fee get a "B" at too many institutions to have the college degree by itself is not the ultimate proof of talent or education.I agree it is going the way of vocational tech. Doesn't attract the talent/education it once commanded with the former higher pay.
The college degree has become a pay your fee get a "B" at too many institutions to have the college degree by itself is not the ultimate proof of talent or education.
How about we have to write an ACT of 29 to get an ATP, that would certainly cut down the pilot ranks by testing for talent and intelligence.Not the ultimate proof, but a pretty reliable indicator of someone's overall competency. Heck, why even require a hs degree for that matter. It will always be a college degree at the more reputable of legacies.
wasn't that way before 9-11If we have any pilots without a four year degree, I would guess that it's less than one percent of a pilot group of over 6,000 (soon to be 7,700) pilots. I would probably play the percentages and get the degree, but that's just me YMMV.
wasn't that way before 9-11
That is most likely the way a lazy HR person looks at it, the probability of college degree person being successful is higher than that of an high school drop out, therefore I will not look at anything in person's history except that box on page one in lower left hand corner.
There are so more ways to prove yourself beyond that simpleton degree than anyone who wants to pay their fee and get their “B” can obtain. For instance the graduate of a military flight training program, they are most likely superior to the college graduate even thought they do not have the paper, partially because they have been screened, unlike just having money and going to a college. This comes to mind and I am sure there are other examples
Probably the army is the only one taking non-4 yr degree guys, but back in the good ole days, we had a number of pilots flying in the Navy without degrees, called them NavCads. They were good pilots and many went on to jobs at the majors, DAL, Pam Am, Eal, etc.All pilots from the Air Force version of military flight training programs completed a four year degree before they were entered in the flight program.... Even so I do agree that it is an easy HR discriminator, whether or not it may be warranted.
wasn't that way before 9-11
That is most likely the way a lazy HR person looks at it, the probability of college degree person being successful is higher than that of an high school drop out, therefore I will not look at anything in person's history except that box on page one in lower left hand corner.
There are so more ways to prove yourself beyond that simpleton degree than anyone who wants to pay their fee and get their “B” can obtain. For instance the graduate of a military flight training program, they are most likely superior to the college graduate even thought they do not have the paper, partially because they have been screened, unlike just having money and going to a college. This comes to mind and I am sure there are other examples