PAPA FOX!
Super Bowl bound 2008!!
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2005
- Posts
- 178
Flying Illini said:All of this talk of eyewitness testimony...
In the case of the pilot and the 16 yr old, there are no witnesses. Who should they believe (not who WILL they believe) when there are no witnesses?
His IS innocent until proven guilty in our criminal justice system. The prosecution must prove "beyond any reasonable doubt" that he forcefully had intercourse with the girl. He said-she said is not B.A.R.D. by any stretch of the imagination. Case in point-look to Kobe Bryant. The case never even made it to a jury let alone win a conviction. Even Michael Jackson's accuser and his siblings couldn't convince a jury BARD despite how strange and wierd MJ was along with the fact many jurors said on the record that they thought there was "a good probability" he actually molested the boy but then said it didn't add up to reasonable doubt. I'm sure some of you will argue the celebrity factor but the truth IMHO is that any competent criminal defense attorney could have aquitted Bryant and Jackson. Probably 95% of all you could have done that if you had as much legal experience as you do piloting experience.
I also agree with LUV and English. Lets just let the investigation take its course. IF, and this is a big if, the girl is found to have made these awful allegations, she ought to be criminally prosecuted and serve prison time just like a real rapist would. On top of that she (or her parents) must be held liable in civil court for damages such as lost wages, ruined reputation, defense costs, etc. Sorry if I'm ranting on too much but falsely accusing another person of rape is EVERY BIT AS SERIOUS as the act of rape itself and must be treated as such in a court of law. Period.