Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

piedmont rumors

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
How could there not be any start up cost. Getting the pilots out there would be cheap, but mx would be another thing.
 
What start up cost? I think the reason we are really still around is the versatility of our airline. We have no start up cost. Just open a bid for PHX, get the planes together and send a few MX Guys out there to work from a US Airway Hanger.
Only cost will be to get all the planes on line.

Now will it happen?? If history tells us anything the answer is "no".


right, we can shrink on a moments notice, very versatile
 
How could there not be any start up cost. Getting the pilots out there would be cheap, but mx would be another thing.

Of course there is some cost, but the cost of getting Mx and Pilots and FA's out to PHX is the least of there worries.
 
Don't want to be a dark cloud, but...

Doesn't MAG have in their contract with (originally AWA) US Airways that no other express carrier may operate out of PHX in said colors other than MAG?
 
PSA (Jetstream) ran J31s out of LAX in 1992. They deadheaded crews out to LA, flew 4 days and deadheaded back on the 4th day. No crew base was used. The mechanics were TDY month by month.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top