furloboy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 79
This sort of discussion has been going on since the beginning of time. I'm an aviation historian, have been published quite a bit, and have interviewed a lot of aviators with experience pre-dating WW II. They all said/say the same sorts of things, and the same sorts of idiots/tools were flying 70 years ago as are flying now.
WW II likely saw the creation of many more pilot-morons than any other period, simply because the nation had to mass manufacture so many of them in such a short time. And I'm second-to-none in my admiration of what they accomplished.
You're dealing with people. And "people-types" never change.
In twenty years there are going to be threads that talk about how the new guys are idiots compared to those that were flying in 2009. Or that Navy/Air Force/Marine/Coastie guys are uptight compared to the rest of the world.
Regards,
Guinness (who was a much better fighter pilot than the non-hacking girls they're turning out nowadays ;-)
WW II likely saw the creation of many more pilot-morons than any other period, simply because the nation had to mass manufacture so many of them in such a short time. And I'm second-to-none in my admiration of what they accomplished.
You're dealing with people. And "people-types" never change.
In twenty years there are going to be threads that talk about how the new guys are idiots compared to those that were flying in 2009. Or that Navy/Air Force/Marine/Coastie guys are uptight compared to the rest of the world.
Regards,
Guinness (who was a much better fighter pilot than the non-hacking girls they're turning out nowadays ;-)