NWA/DAL negotiations update

[stlflyguy]

NEVER give ANY on Seniority!! A pay raise is nice, but seniority determines whether you have a job tomorrow, or next year.

Interesting. ALPA in '01 insisted the TWA pilots HAD to give up their seniority. I wonder why????


stlflyguy

 

[Cobraair75drvr]

That is my point. Just as our 9s will be parked and hopefully replaced (if our dalpa bros don't give up anymore scope) so will the 76s, which will be replaced with our 78 orders(does anyone think that little ol nwa ordered 18 firm w/50 options for themselves)This airline, when combined will be at best the same size today or more than likely 15-20% smaller. This is why sli is more important than pay.

First don't work for either carrier (DAL or NWA), but Cobra, you are absolutely right. Payrates/raises can come and go, but 'seniority' cannot be sold, unless You Give It Away.

And, seniority will be the most important thing going forward, for both sides. With oil at $120-140/bbl (or higher), and a looming recession, slowing of passenger travel, including Int'l travel (recent study showed First/Business class travel to Europe is down 4-5% in the first 4 mths of this year); with all of this taken into account, do you really think the New DAL (post merger) will operate a 750+ mainline a/c fleet???

Do you really think so??

New a/c deliveries can come, but merely replace older a/c that are retired, or worse yet, one new a/c and 2 older retired.

NEVER give ANY on Seniority!! A pay raise is nice, but seniority determines whether you have a job tomorrow, or next year.

For what its worth.

 

[~~~^~~~]

That's exactly what the USAir Easties thought, and then they got RELATIVE SENIORITY.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Actually, relative seniority by equipment. Delta's offer was much better.

Extremely pleased with the NWA response because I would prefer to have sex with myself than the alternative being contemplated.

Now can someone explain the NWA strategy of stapling Compass with a 5 year fence. I'm all for getting them on the list, but what's the angle?

 

[Jmoney]

I hear....

Actually relative seniority, by equipment. Delta's offer was much better. Very pleased with the NWA response because I would prefer to have sex with myself than the alternative being contimplated.

I hear General Lee has sex with himself purty near every time he gets up in the a.m.-spanks that little bitty monkey for all of 15 secs and then he's is all warmed up to hit the ol' keyboard and drop a few more pearls of wisdom on us here......

-Pretty much a self-fluffer, eh Gen?

 

[PlaneDrvr]

That is my point. Just as our 9s will be parked and hopefully replaced (if our dalpa bros don't give up anymore scope) so will the 76s, which will be replaced with our 78 orders(does anyone think that little ol nwa ordered 18 firm w/50 options for themselves)This airline, when combined will be at best the same size today or more than likely 15-20% smaller. This is why sli is more important than pay.

Cobra, I believe more like the latter, at least 15% smaller (a minimum of 10%, but probably 15-20%) and that would mean at least 1200-1500 less pilots than the combined total (maybe as many as 2000 less). And, also, you hit the nail right on the head, Boeing designed the 787 to be a replacement for the 767 (and also the 757ER), so once the 787 come, how long do you think many of those DL 76s will be staying around??

Again, don't work for either, so don't have a dog in this fight, but I'm with you NWA guys, get something very 'fair' for your seniority, that respects your career progression, and Nothing less. Stay Strong and always fight the good fight guys.

PD

 

[~~~^~~~]

That is my point. Just as our 9s will be parked and hopefully replaced (if our dalpa bros don't give up anymore scope) so will the 76s, which will be replaced with our 78 orders(does anyone think that little ol nwa ordered 18 firm w/50 options for themselves)This airline, when combined will be at best the same size today or more than likely 15-20% smaller. This is why sli is more important than pay.

Delta would not be 20% smaller if not for the merger. It isn't Delta's DC9's being replaced by Compass and Mesaba.

767's getting $1Billion worth of seat, IFE and winglet upgrades are not getting phased out. That's just silly talk there.

The 787 has a different role. To wit:
* The Atlantic was once the providence of 747's
* The 767 came along and was the Atlantic "RJ" providing better frequency to smaller markets & hub bypass.
* The 747 flies the Pacific because the 767 does not have the range. The 787, as you point out, is very near a 767, but has the range to do the Pacific.
* The 747's seat mile costs are high, but NWA thinks the 777 is too large for their needs.

Add up those factors and see what you get.

 

[General Lee]

Cobra, I believe more like the latter, at least 15% smaller (a minimum of 10%, but probably 15-20%) and that would mean at least 1200-1500 less pilots than the combined total (maybe as many as 2000 less). And, also, you hit the nail right on the head, Boeing designed the 787 to be a replacement for the 767 (and also the 757ER), so once the 787 come, how long do you think many of those DL 76s will be staying around??

Again, don't work for either, so don't have a dog in this fight, but I'm with you NWA guys, get something very 'fair' for your seniority, that respects your career progression, and Nothing less. Stay Strong and always fight the good fight guys.

PD

I don't think you are right. Our main problem at Delta right now is too many RJs, period. We already dumped our unprofitable fleets, consisting of 737-200s, 737-300s, and 767-200s. What we have today is a pretty efficient fleet, fitting almost every niche, except a 100 seater. Our smallest plane (not including the new 737-700s we will start getting in July) currently is the MD88, and they are more advanced than any MD80 out there, and have low lease rates thanks to BK.

NWA, on the otherhand, has a 100 seater that could be used on some ATL routes, and the only liability I see over there is the older 742s, which even UPS dumped. Could our management dump the DC9s? Sure, but they have said they would like a 100 seater, and we can't get our hands on any right now---even E190s are out of reach for awhile. The 742s could be replaced with NWA 744s eventually, which are proven to be better cargo haulers----even World Airways and Kalitta have gotten a couple recently. The smaller hubs that could take a hit are not very "mainline intensive"---meaning their possible closures would not be a very large hit on mainline (DL has 56 daily mainline flights out of CVG---that's it, MEM is similar). The other hubs will probably stay about the same size, with LAX growing. I don't see much downsizing, instead with an emphasis on growing the INTL side and reducing RJs on the domestic, and maybe even adding some MD90s in a year or so.

Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[General Lee]

Delta would not be 20% smaller if not for the merger. It isn't Delta's DC9's being replaced by Compass and Mesaba.

767's getting $1Billion worth of seat, IFE and winglet upgrades are not getting phased out. That's just silly talk there.

The 787 has a different role. To wit:
* The Atlantic was once the providence of 747's
* The 767 came along and was the Atlantic "RJ" providing better frequency to smaller markets & hub bypass.
* The 747 flies the Pacific because the 767 does not have the range. The 787, as you point out, is very near a 767, but has the range to do the Pacific.
* The 747's seat mile costs are high, but NWA thinks the 777 is too large for their needs.

Add up those factors and see what you get.

I don't think Compass E175s or Mesaba CR9s could replace DC9-50s. (maybe not DC9-40s either) I know they are getting rid of approx 30 DC9-30s, and those are closer in seats than the other models. Our 737-700s have about the same number of seats as the DC94's and -50s, but they have different missions---think Vail and Quito.


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[~~~^~~~]

General:

Steenland's comments are public record. He planned to replace the DC9's and NWA's current fleet plan reflects this.

The E175 and the CRJ900's are very nearly 100 seat aircraft. They are close enough to fit the need and the CRJ900's are at least 8% more efficient on a CASM than any 100 seater out there. ... AND they are pulling some capacity out to increase revenue AND airlines like SkyWest are willing to take on the capital expense of the fleet acquisition AND Delta wants the walk away flexibility in case a really good 100 seater does hit the market in 5 to 10 years.

The 737-700 fits where the CRJ900 is performance limited.

100 seats isn't magic. 76 seats is close enough and a 737-700 is close enough, for now.

If DC9's could be operated profitably, AirTran would still have theirs. But AirTran could not beat MD88's with 9's and Delta can't beat anybody with in any market DC9's. To do so is to ensure an operational loss.

Some of the NWA pilots have realized that the DC9's are going away and think it will have happened by the time the SLI is worked out. I'm hoping they are right.

 

[michael707767]

Actually, relative seniority by equipment. Delta's offer was much better.

excellent point. I think we offered too much already.

 

[Jmoney]

Nice....

I don't think you are right. Our main problem at Delta right now is too many RJs, period. We already dumped our unprofitable fleets, consisting of 737-200s, 737-300s, and 767-200s. What we have today is a pretty efficient fleet, fitting almost every niche, except a 100 seater. Our smallest plane (not including the new 737-700s we will start getting in July) currently is the MD88, and they are more advanced than any MD80 out there, and have low lease rates thanks to BK.

NWA, on the otherhand, has a 100 seater that could be used on some ATL routes, and the only liability I see over there is the older 742s, which even UPS dumped. Could our management dump the DC9s? Sure, but they have said they would like a 100 seater, and we can't get our hands on any right now---even E190s are out of reach for awhile. The 742s could be replaced with NWA 744s eventually, which are proven to be better cargo haulers----even World Airways and Kalitta have gotten a couple recently. The smaller hubs that could take a hit are not very "mainline intensive"---meaning their possible closures would not be a very large hit on mainline (DL has 56 daily mainline flights out of CVG---that's it, MEM is similar). The other hubs will probably stay about the same size, with LAX growing. I don't see much downsizing, instead with an emphasis on growing the INTL side and reducing RJs on the domestic, and maybe even adding some MD90s in a year or so.

Bye Bye--General Lee

An MD-88 is more advanced than an MD-80? REALLY? Damn, you are smart, General!!! Isn't that a bit like saying a turd with peanuts is more advanced than a turd with raisins?

Damn good thing you aren't running the show-IDIOT! Replacing RJs with DC-9s would seem BRILLIANT-if the freaking DC-9 didn't burn more fuel than a 757 and carry only 20 more people than an RJ! You put the "damn" in the phrase "damn fool!"

Maybe they should promote you to upper mgmt. General! You will expedite their slide right back into "BK" (as you like to call it) faster than fecal material thru a goose! Talk about synergies!

-General-you are truly a genetic improbabability... Your mother should really be proud that she was fortunate enough to give rise to the retard of the millenium.... Maybe she should charge for autographs...

 

[~~~^~~~]

JMoney:

The 88 is more advanced. FMC's, authothrottles and more advanced engines are supposed to make a significant difference when compared to M80's.

 

[General Lee]

General:

Steenland's comments are public record. He planned to replace the DC9's and NWA's current fleet plan reflects this.

The E175 and the CRJ900's are very nearly 100 seat aircraft. They are close enough to fit the need and the CRJ900's are at least 8% more efficient on a CASM than any 100 seater out there. ... AND they are pulling some capacity out to increase revenue AND airlines like SkyWest are willing to take on the capital expense of the fleet acquisition AND Delta wants the walk away flexibility in case a really good 100 seater does hit the market in 5 to 10 years.

The 737-700 fits where the CRJ900 is performance limited.

100 seats isn't magic. 76 seats is close enough and a 737-700 is close enough, for now.

If DC9's could be operated profitably, AirTran would still have theirs. But AirTran could not beat MD88's with 9's and Delta can't beat anybody with in any market DC9's. To do so is to ensure an operational loss.

Some of the NWA pilots have realized that the DC9's are going away and think it will have happened by the time the SLI is worked out. I'm hoping they are right.

Hauenstein may not agree with that. But, I can understand where you are going. Regardless, how much does a new CR9 cost with monthly lease rates, only to bring in 76 seats per flight? I think some DC9s will remain to fill in a small niche. We shall see I guess....


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[General Lee]

JMoney:

The 88 is more advanced. FMC's, authothrottles and more advanced engines are supposed to make a significant difference when compared to M80's.

Arguing with JMoney is a complete waste of time since he is incapable of thinking of anything other than toothless ho-bags in Valdosta and Flint. Regardless, I think JMoney has no idea the difference between aircraft anyway. Everytime he follows a C172 into Valdosta, he claims "I have the 727 in sight, I will caution myself on wake turbulence....and I am cleared to land on taxiway Echo...."


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[FBN0223]

Arguing with JMoney is a complete waste of time since he is incapable of thinking of anything other than toothless ho-bags in Valdosta and Flint.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Agreed

 

[Superpilot92]

You will not have a seat lock in a displacement. If you are waiting for a 777, 767, 757 or 737 type, on your ticket, your head work is excellent.

Immediate NWA pilot parity is expected less would not be ratified.

You probably will not find many junior Delta guys who are looking forward to SLI, despite the fact we know it needs to happen. I just hope there is good news hidden in NWA's low fleet utilization numbers.

I know i wont get a seat lock in the event of the a displacement, hence why i am not bidding the bus now. If i get displaced from the -9 i have displacement rights to the bus since people below me are on it. Also after the merger is done if i dont have a seat lock I MIGHT have more flexibility to move to something else. We shall see.

For the SLI, I dont really look forward to it either but It needs to get done so we can move forward regardless of the outcome. Who knows what plane i will be on this time next year

 

[Superpilot92]

JMoney:

The 88 is more advanced. FMC's, authothrottles and more advanced engines are supposed to make a significant difference when compared to M80's.

The DC9 has autothrottles, However we have been *urged* not to use them :bomb:

 

[FmrFreightDog]

The DC9 has autothrottles, However we have been *urged* not to use them :bomb:

Much like we're *urged* not to use Flaps 50.... via a large piece of metal blocking the selection of said feature....

 

[Superpilot92]

Well, I still would like to be Superpilot 92's Captain on that -9. We would have a BLAST in Minot, Flint, and Lansing. Heck, I bet we could "rip the town a new one" in Grand Forks, and watch out Sioux Falls! Me and Super92, we will be KICKIN some Arse!!!! We'll show YOU---FARGO!


Bye Bye--General Lee

Now that would be funny seeing as i would have to teach you how to use enroute charts and navigate without an FMS again!! Besides how can we rip the town a "new one" if you look like Lurch? You are going to have to pull your own weight out on the town, especially in those places.:beer:

 

[Superpilot92]

Much like we're *urged* not to use Flaps 50.... via a large piece of metal blocking the selection of said feature....

Very much like that, but dont pretend you dont think about it though! :nuts: