FlyinPiker
Incon-fricking-spicuous
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2005
- Posts
- 348
LOA 19 came as a result of the Merger with US. IF not for the merger you would be getting NOTHING More right now. We are in this together. You voted in LOA 19 before when the NWA pilots were left out and that was ok but now suddenly when we get the same deal that is allowed because of the joining of OUR companies, its not ok? Fact is we are getting less DC and less Equity but same rates. Our rates mathematically HAVE to be more than yours because we have further to go to get there because of a number of factors. This is about Equality and now your second guessing YOUR MEC, WHY? You trusted them up to this point why the sudden change? Is it Greed? I hope not because if you think you will be able to get MORE in the current state of our industry you are crazy. Some times you have to take it and run and NOW is that time.
What's with the greed talk? I can't say I agree with these guys but I can take a step back and see where they are coming from. They don't want more than what the NWA pilots stand to gain from the new TA they want what they feel is the same as the NWA pilots stand to gain (payout, bonus...whatever).
LOA 19 was not meant as a long term deal. LOA 19 was meant for if this deal was pushed through and both sides weren't able to come to agreement by then . Call it what you want, but it was smart. It was something that actually gave the DAL pilot group a reason to actually listen to the company as they spouted off the benefit's of a merger. It cracks me up when I hear "you guys were fine with LOA19 without the NW pilots"....of course it was without the Northwest pilots...the whole purpose of it was a fall back if both sides weren't able to come to an agreement. If we were both working on it it wouldn't have been an LOA it would have been a TA.
Remember LOA 19 came after our very successful talks on how we were going to handle seniority...thank god the two dynamic's of the unions have changed.
I see a new theme of some seem to be we would never have LOA 19 if it was not for the merger (really?? no new news there), but I actually think we would not have LOA 19 if our unions would have got off to a better start...either way it seemed to get both sides talking again didn't it.
Last edited: