imacdog
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Posts
- 4,196
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As everyone points out we are comparing everything on the 7&7, you have the ability to bid other schedules that pay more. If you are admit about staying on schedule and complaining of suffering I can't help. Having many friends that got furloughed, they did what they had to do to make ends meet. It was very rough for them. If you are a new hire and don't like the TA then vote no, everyone has a vote. Is this TA perfect, no. If some how you have more inside information than our NC, then you should have stepped up and set them straight.
But isn't that your daily comparison ? That regardless of status the pay sucks ? A raise was given , and at a almost 20% home . Most people would LOVE that kind of raise , AND you got a signing bonus . If a revolving door is created with th FO's , then that will induce a market controlled need to offer yet another raise to create an incentive to stay . The market place is an awesome tool when used correctly . If the current pay won't keep pilots at Net Jets , they'll have no choice but to offer the incentive . Still can't see why there is still complaining ..... True some of the hotels aren't the BEST , but they're far from the worst . That's gonna change too . And by the way , we stayed at some pretty great hotels , had almost free reign on food , before someone messed it up by going overboard on dinner and drinks ... And then ....
"Doubled the economy in Arkansas? Let me tell you something. When all you have is a penny all it takes is another penny to double your economy. " -- Ross Perot 1992
If you look at year one and the early years of SIC scale. It is only low to mid 50's percent of PIC pay. At year 10 it reaches about 68%. So yes the junior SICs are not getting the standard 68%. This makes their annual raises look larger as they catch up to 68%.
I find this objectionable and I'm unsure why it was done. Perhaps to trick people into feeling their situation is improving every year. Yes but from a substandard position.
Grammar is not my strong suit, sorry.
Initially I thought this would fail.
Having attended the latest Union meeting, adamant No voters were turned to yes or significantly softened their opposition.
I think the over/under is now about 65% in favor.