gunfyter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2002
- Posts
- 3,785
Unless what they're quietly endorsing is a move towards a strike,, right?
I'm hoping you guys got everything you want and then some. Unlike the poster above, what little I've heard is unimpressive but admittedly it's still all rumor. So, in light of that possibility, let's just play devils advocate for a minute.
If it's a real $hit sandwich and the negotiations weren't going anywhere, wouldn't it be a precursor move to an effective strike to just put out something vanilla and have a resounding NO! vote on the TA?
What are the bylaws and/or federal regs regarding strikes? Aren't there some dominoes that have to fall first? Maybe they're just taking care of the dominoes.
Not trying to stir the pot, just honestly asking as one who's not offended by the concept of choking the golden goose til it lays it's egg.
We have little to no solid info. However, the E-board and the NC have stated very clearly over the last many months that no TA would be presented unless it was something they believed the membership should endorse and that they believed would be ratified.
I strongly suspect this will be a deal that should pass in the election.
I also suspect this because management erred in 2004 by offering a deal so horrible that the reaction was so unanimously negative it resulted in a far more expensive contract for them just a year later. They won't want to make that mistake again.
Last edited: