NJA size

[G4dude]

You're kidding, right? Hammered by a few? ANYONE that expresses an opinion on that board that isn't 100% pro-union dogma is DESTROYED unmercifully.

It doesn't matter how well-reasoned or sincere the viewpoint. The merits of the argument are totally dismissed and the politics of personal destruction, derision, and name-calling begin. A civil disagreement over important issues is IMPOSSIBLE and more poo gets flung than by 100 crack-addicted monkeys at the San Diego Zoo.

This site is much the same although the presence of outsiders somewhat tempers the discussion.

In my best Andy Rooney imitation: "Ever notice how few people actually post on the message board anymore? Maybe it's because they're sick of being called stupid by people that don't know the difference between to, too, and two just because they have a different opinion..."

Thank you, thank you, thank you. I was feeling kinda outnumbered! The union guys feel they are in the vast majority mainly because we free market types avoid the personal attacks and stay off the boards, ESPECIALLY the non-anonymous ones. There are a whole lot more of us that the union people realize. So, thank you again, Gutshot.

 

[Pervis]

And finally, I never stated what you had or had not done..... It's up to you if you feel it was an indescretion or not.

A quote from your post #212-the last sentence:

"Unfortunately your indiscretion was both easy to discover and pretty public in the NJA world."

Twisting the truth is another common tactic used by some on the union boards. Most simply skim over multiple threads and miss the manipulations so common to the more aggressive attack dogs. But not because they don't pay attention. They've come to expect it.

 

[G4dude]

A quote from your post #212-the last sentence:

"Unfortunately your indiscretion was both easy to discover and pretty public in the NJA world."

Twisting the truth is another common tactic used by some on the union boards. Most simply skim over multiple threads and miss the manipulations so common to the more aggressive attack dogs. But not because they don't pay attention. They've come to expect it.

I don't think they realize how many of us wouldn't dream of spending time on the ASAP board, because it is too unpleasant. Differences are not treated as honest, but as attacks on the Working Class, per Karl Marx. I am exaggerating of course.

 

[Pervis]

Gutshot, you're right. But those attacks come from the same few and are seen by the majority for what they are. Those few hang in a tight little circle where everyone agrees with each other, and when on the road, they intimidate to the point few will disagree for fear of creating an unpleasant work environment.

A few of us stand up to the bullies, and many more silently support us. I'm not asking anyone else to join the frey, so to speak, but am asking more to stay informed with some very important decisions that are being made. The Eboard members frequently respond to questions and concerns, and do so without emotion for the most part. While I don't always agree with them, they stand apart from the more aggressive types.

 

[OPECJet]

G4, what concerns you more. A union that won't cave on concessions that will only make improvements to a member of management's image in the eyes of a senile old SOB, or a management team who will willingly deny an owner access to his aircraft in order to circumvent the scope section of the CBA?

Cry "bad economy" all you want. The other fracs seem to be selling shares and replacing aircraft while NJA isn't. In the meantime, you think giving up scope will save your job by saving the company. Stop being scared.

 

[G4dude]

G4, what concerns you more. A union that won't cave on concessions that will only make improvements to a member of management's image in the eyes of a senile old SOB, or a management team who will willingly deny an owner access to his aircraft in order to circumvent the scope section of the CBA?

Cry "bad economy" all you want. The other fracs seem to be selling shares and replacing aircraft while NJA isn't. In the meantime, you think giving up scope will save your job by saving the company. Stop being scared.

I am sorry, I am with management on this one. And I think we are entering a 4 year worldwide recession, followed by significant inflation. We better be careful how hard we push CMH.

 

[fischman]

It's okay to be wrong.

 

[OPECJet]

I am sorry, I am with management on this one. And I think we are entering a 4 year worldwide recession, followed by significant inflation. We better be careful how hard we push CMH.

No argument on the recession. I believe that will be the case as well. My problem is that rather than use the recession to secure NJA's future as whole, current management is using it as an excuse to cut what doesn't need to be cut. For the rest of your argument, I want some of what you're smoking.

 

[mtnrunner]

Blame game...

My problem is that rather than use the recession to secure NJA's future as whole, current management is using it as an excuse to cut what doesn't need to be cut.

With the exception of housing all sectors and industries top tier companies are performing exceptionally well. Even Warren says this is the case at Berkshire Hathaway. They have best of bread leaders with talented management teams. They took care of the hard stuff in 2009, and went to work focussing on the soft stuff building and looking for growth opportunities; organic growth or M&A. These top tier companies are producing top line growth and strong earnings. They don't get to blame a recession - if they do they get replaced.

A recession is a poor excuse for a leader who can't deliver. The second weakest thing I could think of is blaming the employees/unions. The weakest thing I can think of is a leader who hides - hides from employees, customers, and OEM's.

Nothing is going to get done hiding in a CMH office or board room all day and blaming your employees and customers. Blaming employees for not taking more cuts and then blaming customers for having less money to waste on 10 year old airplanes.

I would have to say in the real world the only one not blaming leadership and management - is leadership and management. That said, a lot of managers in CMH are blaming their leader.

 

[G4dude]

No argument on the recession. I believe that will be the case as well. My problem is that rather than use the recession to secure NJA's future as whole, current management is using it as an excuse to cut what doesn't need to be cut. For the rest of your argument, I want some of what you're smoking.

I do admit I advocate legalization (decriminalization) of narcotics. Another good conversation, perhaps? Cheers!

 

[G4dude]

With the exception of housing all sectors and industries top tier companies are performing exceptionally well. Even Warren says this is the case at Berkshire Hathaway. They have best of bread leaders with talented management teams. They took care of the hard stuff in 2009, and went to work focussing on the soft stuff building and looking for growth opportunities; organic growth or M&A. These top tier companies are producing top line growth and strong earnings. They don't get to blame a recession - if they do they get replaced.

A recession is a poor excuse for a leader who can't deliver. The second weakest thing I could think of is blaming the employees/unions. The weakest thing I can think of is a leader who hides - hides from employees, customers, and OEM's.

Nothing is going to get done hiding in a CMH office or board room all day and blaming your employees and customers. Blaming employees for not taking more cuts and then blaming customers for having less money to waste on 10 year old airplanes.

I would have to say in the real world the only one not blaming leadership and management - is leadership and management. That said, a lot of managers in CMH are blaming their leader.

What is the general opinion of Hansell's management performance so far? Is he planning to stay?

 

[OPECJet]

I do admit I advocate legalization (decriminalization) of narcotics. Another good conversation, perhaps? Cheers!

Given your willingness and desire to sell me out, and damage my family further, I highly doubt we'll be having many "good" conversations.

 

[BentOver]

What is the general opinion of Hansell's management performance so far? Is he planning to stay?

I'd say not a chance.. Outta of the throngs of "leaders" I've seen come and go over the last decade. Hansell is by far the worst leader. The guy is basically non-exhistant.


Sokol was probably a better leader than Hansell, but Sokol was definitely the most arrogant and detrimental to an operation. He had no clue what to do with a high end luxury business utilizing airplanes as the product.

It's sad that the two worst executives I've ever seen in aviation had to happen to NJA back to back. They made executives at regionals actually look pretty good!!

IMO Hansell will be done shortly. (by shortly I hope within 1-1.5 years. If not sooner)

 

[gutshotdraw]

Given your willingness and desire to sell me out, and damage my family further, I highly doubt we'll be having many "good" conversations.

Et voila...

 

[mtnrunner]

Don't allow management to lower your expectations...

What is the general opinion of Hansell's management performance so far? Is he planning to stay?

Keeping it performance based only:
~If he furloughs he has failed.
~If he doesn't add 2 new airplanes for every 1 airplane disposed of starting Jan 2012 he has failed.
~If he doesn't add 2 new customers for every one that leaves starting Jan 2012 he has failed.
~If he doesn't secure (at least arguably) NEW best-in-class aircraft for each category and start selling them in 2012 he has failed.
~If he doesn't sell at least 50 Globals he has failed.
~If he doesn't get 85% of share owners to 1/8 or above he has failed.
~If he can't reconstruct one of the industry's best Labor-Management relationships he has failed.
~If he doesn't get fleet and aircraft availability back up to 80+ percent he has failed to impress...

~If one aircraft burns or one person gets hurt in an incident or accident he has failed beyond imagination.

~If he can't reconstruct one of the world's best brands, with the exceptional workforce in place, he has failed.

In my opinion he has certainly failed to capture any ground up support from within the company and management ranks. Few would pop a tear if he went back to practicing law with his old man in Iowa. I don't think he will be at many BBQ's in ICT, SAV, or Paris any time soon either. He clearly isn't here to inspire.

The more an individual blames their fellow employees and buys-into management excuses (recessions and unions), then they have failed. An individual doesn't have to like unions or their peers, but everyone must demand performance from leadership and management.

Don't take the bait. Focus on the management performance, not their excuses. Warren, unions, and the pilots should only be happy to see a leader deliver on the above points. All of which are reasonable. If they have convinced you otherwise - think it over again.


I'm a simply person, I just want to see a leader that can inspire me and deliver. Thousand of pilots inspire me an deliver every day.

But in the end its all just one more opinion for the pile. Until next time.