Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DO-82 driver said:Another major selling point for NetJets is our ability to recover flights with our own a/c. If one of our planes break, especially east of the Mississippi, there is a very good chance that there is a plane and crew fairly close to recover the trip. I have heard several owners mention this as a very good feature.
Just out of curiousity....what is the pilot count and a/c count for Flex? Those Canadairs are beautiful planes.
JTrain said:Out of curiosity, how come Bombardier doesn't have the Global Express in the FlexJet program? Seems to me if they wanted to match NJ with options from entry level a/c through mid-sized and inter-continental range, the Global Express would be a logical addition. Yes, the CL604 can cross the pond and beyond, but the Global Express is more in the Gulfstrem category.
Hogprint said:Jtrain, they had three a few years ago, but then sold them (I'm pretty sure it was flex and not options). Maybe a Flex bubba can clear it up.
Nja owner thanks for responding. I really hope flex managment reads this. NJA owner I hope we can get your consideration next time around. Thanks for the reply. Guys hope I didn't offend anybody.NJAowner said:Sorry guys -- I was out of town for a few days and not online.
The overwhelming reason why I never deriously considered Flex when I originally went with NJA was $$$. Until recently, when you purchased a share in your jet from Flex you owned it for 5 years (the term of the management contract). At the end of the 5 years, you sold your share back at its current value and then needed to buy a new share at at the then current prices. In other words, you needed to cough up much more $$$ to fly in the same planes. They admitted to doing this to sell more planes for the parent. With NJA, you continue to own your share and at the end of the 5 year term just pay the new management fee. No need to cough up more $$$.
Example, you put $1,000,000 into a share for 5 years. After 5 years, you sell your share back to Flex for 70% = $700,000. A new share in the same jet is now over $1,200,000. To continue flying the same fleet, you need to come up with another $500,000. This cost Flex many sales. I believe in the past 1-2 years Flex elimiated this and made its strructure more like NJA's.
Reason #2 was what I would call "depth of the fleet". I fly in and out of a small Rocky Mountain airport several times per year. I am friendly with a Flex owner in the area. When there are last minute mechanical problems, it is not uncommon for himn to wait 6-8 hours for another plane. Just not enough planes in the neighborhood. My delay is usually 1-2 hours out west, minutes ont he East Coast. The ability to get a replacement plane to out of the way locations has been a problem (according to the few owners at the others which I know) for CS, Flex, FLops. It is not a problem along the East and West coasts, but can be in the middle of no where.Fly safe.
I think you may find that Flex has improved. One of our senior execs wanted a private 1/8th share in a mid-sized cabin aircraft so we helped him run the wickets on his purchase. This is what we found.NJAowner said:The overwhelming reason why I never seriously considered Flex when I originally went with NJA was $$$.