NJ Recalls

[T-1GUY]

Somehow that doesn't surprise me one bit.

 

[OPECJet]

Question for NJ guys. I'm currently a regional CA /commuter/ line holder. Don't see career progression with current employer. Looking for stability and more time with family, even if it means 7 on 7 off. That's better than 5 on 2 off currently. I would appreciate any feedback

You will have schedule stability but likely little to no career stability. I do not believe based on their actions that current management foresees NJA as a going concern. You will be a probationary pilot in what has become the most toxic labor/mgmt relationship I've ever seen.

 

[Sky Captain]

NJA is the BEST job I ever had. Just not perfect. I don't see what's so hard about it.

Then why did you sue your company?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...s-sued-by-pilots-claiming-privacy-breach.html

 

[Hawkered]

It won't go far. People left theit passwords on company devices and turned them back into the company for IT problems!!

Please stop doing that!!

 

[acaTerry]

That's no excuse. If someone leaves their wallet on the counter does it justify me taking their credit cards?

 

[jonjuan]

That's no excuse. If someone leaves their wallet on the counter does it justify me taking their credit cards?

What if the wallet is owned by the company?

 

[pilotyip]

Yip is a legend in his own mind. And a delusional one at that.

delusional? isn't that what FI is all about, that pilots are the center of universe?:laugh:

 

[Hawkered]

What if the wallet is owned by the company?

It's an interesting case, but unfortunately, I see the company winning this one. The device is company owned, many use it on company provided time and WiFi.

There's a burden of responsibility for each employee's actions to be monitored in the workplace, (think breaches of confidentiality regarding owner movements, trading in ellicit materials or Post 9/11 security concerns). It would also seem pretty obvious that they can watch us "while we work" on these devices at the server.

I don't think we can stop them doing it. We just need to stop using company devices to go on websites such as these, or for any personal use.

Seems obvious, I know!

 

[acaTerry]

It's an interesting case, but unfortunately, I see the company winning this one. The device is company owned, many use it on company provided time and WiFi.

There's a burden of responsibility for each employee's actions to be monitored in the workplace, (think breaches of confidentiality regarding owner movements, trading in ellicit materials or Post 9/11 security concerns). It would also seem pretty obvious that they can watch us "while we work" on these devices at the server.

I don't think we can stop them doing it. We just need to stop using company devices to go on websites such as these, or for any personal use.

Seems obvious, I know!

After reading this, I agree. If it was in fact done on company devices, they set themselves up. One has to be smarter than that.

 

[Hawkered]

After reading this, I agree. If it was in fact done on company devices, they set themselves up. One has to be smarter than that.

I've seen people posting on the message board on company i-Pad while in recurrent!