jarhead said:
Are you really that thick headed? People ARE starving to death in New Orleans. Little 3 and 4 week old infants with no baby formula have starved to death. The corpses of some are on the floor in the Super Dome. The bodies of elderly men and women are rotting on the overpasses by the Super Dome. For you to blithely state with some sort of false intellect....etc., etc., etc...
Jarhead, as usual, you are just about as interesting to read as, say, a Krugman column. You spout off about how outrageous and stupid right-wing media types are, and then you quote at length from the Rush Limbaugh of Liberal columnists.
I get it, I get it, I get it... GWB is responsible. The Republicans are responsible.
FOR EVERYTHING. This country is going to **** in a handbasket and it's all their fault. Everyone in the Republican-dominated government knew ahead of time that NO was going to take a hit and they did nothing about it. The science of hurricane forecasting has never claimed a major storm was about to wipe out a population center and then that population center barely got rain, so every doom-and-gloom report was absolutely above reproach and the city of NO should have been evacuated by force. 100,000 Marines should've been waiting 50mi north to stop the looters that they knew were going to run rampant in the city (and the Gulf coast), but they couldn't, since GWB is gleefully getting them all killed overseas. If we weren't in Iraq, all those troops would be handing out daisies in a dry NO. Hey, maybe GWB is doing all this because he doesn't like people who are, as Wolf Blitzer said, "So poor, so black".
I would go on, but even
you get the idea. I can see every one of your pithy little arguments coming a mile away. Amazing how this administration is responsible for absolutely EVERY wrong. Your arguments were old a year ago and aren't getting any more fresh.
I may be thick-headed, but at least I can read. I said "otherwise healthy people are not dropping dead of starvation". Your post paints a picture of hundreds of people lying about dead all over the place, all of starvation. If, in fact, there are dead babies strewn across overpasses and sporting arenas, is it possible that they died of
some other cause than starvation in 100hrs? Have a handful of people died of starvation, the already desperately ill and the very young? I'm sure they have. Is it the largest concern in NO right now? Are there going to be stacks of bodies by week's end because thousands have died of starvation? Not by a long shot. The real problem is not grumbling in the stomach, it's the cesspool that these people are wading through or floating on and the lack of medicine for those who currently depend upon them. What they need is WATER and to get the **** out of there, especially the infirm and those in hospital who are more susceptible to shortages of water, medicine, and yes, food.
I know you're always quick to jump down my throat on any point whatsoever, but are you enough of a fool to not recognize my point that there aren't funeral pyres of hundreds of dead who got that way because they STARVED in a period of time that doesn't even encompass a regular work week? Apparently you are.
After skimming the rest of your drivel I got your other point, that of course I am somehow not "feeling" enough for the people of NO. Of COURSE you would say that... Standard leftie maneuver, that one, if you don't agree in whole with every claim of horror in NO, you are an unfeeling Republican. No surprise. It's completely unbelievable that anyone would raise an eyebrow in disbelief or question a point that lapses into hyperbole, right?
But then again, you probably don't recognize what I'm talking about, as it's the staple of half your posts, if not more.