Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the arguement is going to be on 'intent'?
You had plenty of time to put that in writing and it wasn't done. It's not in the agreement. Definitely an uphill battle when a company has a business to run...and decisions to be made accordingly.
We get it, MJ . . . You didn't make the cutoff to upgrade into one of the Captain seats we agreed to give up, and so now you've convinced yourself that the rest of our 717 CA seats are "spoils" that you should be entitled to, and it's our MEC's fault, or SWA management, or our pilot group.
You're not going to convince anyone on our side of the partition that you're right, and you're not going to suddenly see it our way either, so what's the point of this incessant bickering?
"Not really. By that time it was just a case of take it or leave it."
So your beef with SWA is that:
1) you were verbally promised 717 seats (and bid accordingly)
2) you weren't given the time or opportunity by SWA to get that language in the agreement
I understand that if you bid on an aircraft that no longer exists, you would want the chance to rebid...but that would incur training costs to SWA...you want a piece of some of that money that SWA is saving by not allowing a rebid...well, since we are "all on the same team" you shouldn't have any problem sharing some of those gains with your SWA bros and sis's? Or maybe you would and maybe we are really not on the same team...on this issue...
"
I understand that if you bid on an aircraft that no longer exists, you would want the chance to rebid...but that would incur training costs to SWA...you want a piece of some of that money that SWA is saving by not allowing a rebid...well, since we are "all on the same team" you shouldn't have any problem sharing some of those gains with your SWA bros and sis's? Or maybe you would and maybe we are really not on the same team...on this issue...