Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

New AAI ALPA Strategy: Fire SWA Haters!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Register   Log in
Just thinking said:
"Oh, and I agree with you that seniority is king when it comes to upgrade. Those hired first, upgrade first. Simple!"

Not a single SWA pilot has ever by passed up-grade in the past ten years?
I understand they used to have to upgrade when their seniority number came around but every single person on the seniority list has upgraded as soon as their seniority could hold the seat?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what you're asking, but until the last cba, you had no choice. When your number came up, you passed upgrade training or you were gone.

You certainly didn't upgrade before those hired before you, unless you were in a junior domicile, in which case the senior guy could've/would've upgraded before you by moving to the junior domicile.

In the last 18 months, we've had the ability to bypass, but I doubt anyone has.
 
Last edited:
Tripower455 said:
Really? It's industry standard. Isn't that wayat AT?
Click to expand...

Yes it is. Upgrade is seniority based at AT just like everywhere else. But if you're implying what I think you are, you might be disappointed with the SLI.
 
Ty Webb said:
I've been on Flightinfo since 1996. I didn't join because I have one "issue" unlike many others on here now. There are waaay too many guys on here talking smack about my AirTran brothers to just ignore.

You guys who suggest that I should be an FO since I own a business are pretty funny. . . . Didn't realize we had so many socialists in this industry. . . . :rolleyes: Maybe everyone with a military pension should stay FO . . . . Maybe guys who kept their first wife should stay FO's and make way for the guys who have ex-wives and child support payments. Maybe the guys with the messiest lives, biggest mortgages or worst credit scores should get preference at upgrade. :laugh:
Click to expand...

I think you should be an FO because your flying skills are about as low as your credit score. Take that moron!:crying:
 
Last edited:
-9Capt said:
Yes it is. Upgrade is seniority based at AT just like everywhere else. But if you're implying what I think you are, you might be disappointed with the SLI.
Click to expand...

I think what he is implying is that if you think your seniority at AT with less longevity than a SWA guy means something, then you might be the one that is disappointed with the SLI. All we really expect is that you be realistic with your expectations. Just as you think a staple is unrealistic (which I, for one, agree), so do we think that relative seniority (which you espouse, and which would actually be damaging to a SWA pilots career) is unrealistic, to the extreme. Maybe you don't think so, but we will fight tooth and nail to prove you wrong. I'm a friend of Tri's, and I'm pretty sure that's what he's implying - and he's pretty much spot on as to the SWA guys feelings on your "relative dreams". If that's what your implying.

Fraternally,
PapaWoody
 
I would expect your NC to fight tooth and nail for the best deal possible for their members. Just like I expect our MC to do the same for us. That's why I thing it will end up in arbitration. It's going to take neutral, objective outsiders to determine what is "realistic".
 
-9Capt said:
I would expect your NC to fight tooth and nail for the best deal possible for their members. Just like I expect our MC to do the same for us. That's why I thing it will end up in arbitration. It's going to take neutral, objective outsiders to determine what is "realistic".
Click to expand...

I hope it goes to arbitration. What does that tell you???
 
So do I. After speaking with Tom W. I feel real good about arbitration and what will come afterward.
 
vixin said:
So do I. After speaking with Tom W. I feel real good about arbitration and what will come afterward.
Click to expand...

Real cute. Doesn't work. Good luck.
 
Last edited:
-9Capt said:
Yes it is. Upgrade is seniority based at AT just like everywhere else. But if you're implying what I think you are, you might be disappointed with the SLI.
Click to expand...

I wasn't implying anything. Ty went off on a rant when I said that if I were in his shoes, I would either stay mega senior in the right seat, or more likely quit, which I would.

I assumed that his rant about socialism etc, meant that he thought that the seniority system was OK, and I agreed with him. No implication. Those hired first get to upgrade first.

You guys are wound a little too tight.....
 
"those hired first should upgrade first"...tripower

So you're saying all the tranny caps that have a hire date at AirTran that's after the most junior SW cap should lose their seats? Is that what you're saying mr tripower?
 
Clyde Frog said:
"those hired first should upgrade first"...tripower

So you're saying all the tranny caps that have a hire date at AirTran that's after the most junior SW cap should lose their seats? Is that what you're saying mr tripower?
Click to expand...

Geez you guys are dense.....

Read what I wrote. That's what I meant.

For a bunch of folks that just got a huge career boost, in every imaginable way, regardless of the outcome, you FI AT guys seem pretty angry.
 
Last edited:
He just asked a question...Geez, who pissed on your cornflakes?

BTW it was a simple question and you still didn't answer it.
 
Last edited:

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest resources

Latest media

Carbon Cub FX-3 Shenandoah Valley
Carbon Cub at Kittyhawk
FX-3 in the backcountry
IFR Panel in a Carbon Cub FX-3
Cub-Provo-UT-c.jpg
Back
Top