I have three points in response to your post, which is just thinly veiled envy, imo:
1. SWA pilots are paid approximately what we were paid in the mid 80's, adjusted for inflation. So it would seem that we aren't "overpaid relative" to our peers, our peers are underpaid relative to us. The leverage that you have in your next negotiations will be due to us, whereas we will gain nothing from your anemic contract. You're welcome.
This then-and-now argument interests me. I'm not talking about what you made in the 1980's, or what Pan Am paid in the 1960's, or any other analogy. I'm talking about now. Southwest pilots, now, today, are paid a lot more than pilots flying similar equipment at other airlines. Your argument assumes that every pilot group is engaged in pattern bargaining. Some competing unions are NOT asking for an improvement to the Southwest contract. These facts illustrate the point that Southwest pilots relatively overpaid.
2. At which point, when SWA has continued to be profitable come hell or high water, should we, in your esteemed opinion, consider giving some of our "overpay" back? Sorry your company's business plan can't support a decent contract - a problem that we don't currently (and probably never will) have.
I never stated you should return money to your employer.
3. Herb has always run his airline with the concept that although a viable culture might cost him a little money in the short term, it would save him / make him money in the long term. Every time. And I'm pretty sure Gary knows that also.
Thanks for your concern. However, we and our AirTran brothers and sisters will be just fine without it. Now go work on getting back what you gave away.
Why do you speak for "Herb" and "Gary?" Do you know these people personally? Are you directed to speak this way by a representative of the corporation? I had assumed you were labor.