Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NetJets Strike Passes By 93%

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hawkered, the list was started because the company must provide an equitable amount of flying for all pilots. We need to know who volunteered and who received extended days so the whole group can see if the company showed any favortism in it's scheduling practice. I have a right to learn who worked all their "off days" and didn't work their schedules days. This is to TRY to prevent the "A Team" abuse that happened before. Sorry but we still have some suck a$$es here that would do anything to lick the ball sweat from a company manager.
 
more double talk

Some Dude said:
Hawkered, the list was started because the company must provide an equitable amount of flying for all pilots. We need to know who volunteered and who received extended days so the whole group can see if the company showed any favortism in it's scheduling practice. I have a right to learn who worked all their "off days" and didn't work their schedules days. This is to TRY to prevent the "A Team" abuse that happened before. Sorry but we still have some suck a$$es here that would do anything to lick the ball sweat from a company manager.

Since it was proven the "A Team" was a theory of your imagination, I guess you don't really have the right after all.

With all the pilots calling in tired these days, and the shortage of pilots, that alone shows NJA crews are not only getting equitable amounts but apparently are being scheduled too many flights... hence, your argument falls apart.

Besides, who made you the company watchdog?
 
dsptchrNJA said:
It's one thing to name names when you know what you are talking about. But when you don't even have the correct facts you look like a complete halfwit. Any credibility you had just went down the tubes.

Don't be so hard on yourself dsptcrNJA by calling yourself a complete halfwit.

So now your saying that a scheduler didn't punch his fist through a wall?

Post whatever company propagana and lies you want if that's what makes you feel like a man, a company man that is. We who are in the fight know THE REAL FACTS, your company spin won't hurt me, only you and your credibility.

Anyone who reads this message board can go to the ibt1108 website and read the facts, not the company spin.

I'm sorry that you were an abused child, nimwit fits you much better nancy boy.
 
dsptchrNJA said:
Since it was proven the "A Team" was a theory of your imagination, I guess you don't really have the right after all.


I guess it was a figment of my imagination when I was out as an FO, and we only had shows after 11am, only two legs a day, and hit the Caymans, Bahamas, Aspen, and all the hot spots. All in one tour. The CP even called the capt every day to ask us if we were having fun yet....

This was back when I didn't have a tour with less than three or four 14/10s and 5 -6 legs a day.

Got the same guy two tours in a row, and the same thing. Not that I didn't have fun, but it's a little naive to think that there was no A-team.

Now before you say it was a coincidence, had other buds that flew with this guy and the same thing. Smooth sailing compared to their other tours.
 
I've never really understood these overtime boycotts by unions.....they seem so counterproductive for a couple of reasons:

1. If the union members really are trying to prepare for a strike then they need to sock away all the money they can for the lean times. Unilaterally limiting your income just hurts that effort

2. An overtime boycott actually forces the company to become more efficient in its use of the available resources. Once the OT boycott has been abandoned, the 'normal' levels of OT are no longer available as the company has learned that it doesnt need it anymore
 
I got it now CMHTroll so the company is spending a ton of money on fighting the arbitrators ruling and paying J to sit at home because it's the American way? So is it the American way just to waste money on inefficient scheduling and more VP's than you need?

So the company has decided to ignore the rule of law and ignore what the lawyers are telling them just because it's the American way? You might want to do a little case study on what the company must prove in order to get an arbitrators ruling overturned.

Man you really are delusional.
 
Keeping the Owners Safe

The Company is fighting the concept of a pilot's employment who brings violence into the workplace. Who knows what he might do. It is al about safety and J's capacity for violence. Yes the Company has always spent a ton of money on safety.

I am sure that you have every answer too scheduling and management so why are you flying the line? What do think the correct number of VPs, Directors, Managers, Supervisors, Specialists it takes to schedule, coordinate, book food, sell shares, maintain aircraft for 700 flights a day, every day? Sparky you are clueless.
 
CMHTroll said:
The Company is fighting the concept of a pilot's employment who brings violence into the workplace. Who knows what he might do. It is all about safety and J's capacity for violence. Yes the Company has always spent a ton of money on safety.

The company is wasting it's time and money. The arbitrator ruled. NJA lost. This company wastes more money fighting concepts when it should be concentrating on business. The only reason to push the point in Federal Court is for CYA reasons of future potential liability.

Even NJA's Security Chief assigned J a rating of 1 out of 10 (lowest) in terms of his threat to safety. NJA fired that Security Profesional for not going with the program.

CMHTroll said:
I am sure that you have every answer too scheduling and management so why are you flying the line? What do think the correct number of VPs, Directors, Managers, Supervisors, Specialists it takes to schedule, coordinate, book food, sell shares, maintain aircraft for 700 flights a day, every day? Sparky you are clueless.

If we wanted to be part of "management" then we would have concentrated our efforts towards that effect instead of learning to fly planes. Management is a job required by all companies but practiced very poorly by most (especialy this one).

Correct number of VPs? As few as possible.

He flies the line because he is a pilot. He was hired as a pilot. Pilot have tried to offer suggestions to "management" over the years to no avail. You guys are truly doing a "bang up" job there in CMH. Keep going. It's ben one hell of a train wreck so far and the view is just fine from up here.
 
Well i couldn't have said it any better myself flylow.

CMHtroll
If they are so concerned with safety why didn't they fire Chips Ahoy? Hmmmm I wonder.

Edit-

The one group we should be hiring in droves are more dispatchers. They are overworked, underpaid and need to focus more on aircraft specific than just the shotgun approach.

We probably need double the dispatchers we have right now. They are truely overworked.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top