NETJETS Seat Lock and Upgrade Section 5.3

[fischman]

Keep in mind during your calculations that we are selling off airplanes as well. (Ultra for example)

 

[VVJM265]

Puck,

If upgrade is longer than 3.25 I would RUN from the Uboat for the G200, Falcon or 800XP. It is all a gamble, but my guess is that we won't see a Captain with a 2000 seniorty number for at least another 16 months. Hang in there.

The mid March list shows two with numbers higher 2000, half a dozen or so between 1900 & 2000, more PICs below 1800. Bring

 

[VVJM265]

Puck,

If upgrade is longer than 3.25 I would RUN from the Uboat for the G200, Falcon or 800XP. It is all a gamble, but my guess is that we won't see a Captain with a 2000 seniorty number for at least another 16 months. Hang in there.

The mid March list shows two with numbers higher 2000, half a dozen or so between 1900 & 2000, lots more PICs below 1800. Bring on those airplanes!

 

[PUCKFA18]

Guys's thanks again for your intel

VVJM265: The pilots you are indicating are prior contract and no more bypass. So, the ones you indicate are a wash. But, thanks for the input.
Welcome aboard

 

[VVJM265]

Guys's thanks again for your intel

VVJM265: The pilots you are indicating are prior contract and no more bypass. So, the ones you indicate are a wash. But, thanks for the input.
Welcome aboard

Thanks. Plan for the worst and hope for the best!
:beer:

 

[NJA bound]

cheers :beer:

 

[acaTerry]

Upgrades are at snell pace.

DAMMIT PVT PUCK!! It's "SNAIL" pace!! I think I need to seat lock you another 2 years. :beer:

 

[PUCKFA18]

aceterry: I know........Those dang Blackberry’s...... Guilty as charged!

S/F

 

[RJ Bum]

I'm a new guy starting in May. At what point are you not considered a "new hire" as stated in 5.3(a)(i)?

 

[gunfyter]

I'm a new guy starting in May. At what point are you not considered a "new hire" as stated in 5.3(a)(i)?

<B>

5.3(a) New Hires​

</B>

All pilots hired after the date of ratification of this Agreement shall, upon their date of​

​

hire, incur a two (2) year equipment lock​

You are not considered a new hire after your equipment lock is completed or you upgrade... before your 2 yr initial equipment lock.

The purpose of being considered a new hire is to Not be restricted from upgrading to Captain based on the arbitrary assignment of aircraft type by the company upon initial hiring. No one has an advantage or disadvantage in upgrading to Captain based upon this initial aircraft assignment.

In the past it was possible to upgrade before persons senior to you simply because of this arbitrary assignment. These more senior persons were considered BYPASSED for upgrade. They received PIC pay while still SICs since a junior pilot upgraded only because of the Equipment locks.

The company does not want to pay PIC pay to SICs. Therefore you will NOT be restricted from being awarded the first available PIC spot your seniority can hold.

If howevever you bid and get awarded an SIC spot in another type... You will be held to the equipment lock and can no longer win a Captain position in another type for 2 yrs.​

 

[acaTerry]

aceterry: I know........Those dang Blackberry’s...... Guilty as charged!

S/F

How can you stand waiting 1,254,354 hours for that thing to load flightinfo? Requesting.....Loading Scripts.....Running Scripts......Loading Images.....and so on...:beer:

 

[RJ Bum]

ok got ya, thanks. see ya online.

 

[FLYLOW22]

I'm a new guy starting in May. At what point are you not considered a "new hire" as stated in 5.3(a)(i)?

When you start getting hair on your chest or at the end of probation, whichever occurs first.

 

[PUCKFA18]

RJ Bum: you are only probation for one year. So, May 2008 your off probation and still have another year of seatlock.

aceterry: I have the new "improved" blackberry

 

[Ultra Grump]

The Blackberry's no excuse for poor spelling.

 

[gunfyter]

The Blackberry's no excuse for poor spelling.

"Blackberry's." Or poor grammar?

 

[PUCKFA18]

Excuse me gentlemen............ Now, I know why they warned me about this board. Since I seem to bother you all with my grammar and spelling, I'll make this my last psot.

Enjoy

 

[gunfyter]

Since I seem to bother you all with my grammar and spelling, I'll make this my last psot.

Was just ribbing Grump on his grammar while complaining about spelling.

 

[Ultra Grump]

Was just ribbing Grump on his grammar while complaining about spelling.

Nice try, gun. Try reading it as "The Blackberry is..." ("The Blackberry's..."). Get it now?

 

[gunfyter]

Nice try, gun. Try reading it as "The Blackberry is..." ("The Blackberry's..."). Get it now?

I am not familiar with contractions of any form of the verb "to be" combined with nouns. I have only seen this with pronouns like it's, he's, she's, they're.

How nice is my try now?