WillowRunVortex said:
If ALPA had supported the strike a BK judge would have determined the mech's fate. I would take my chances with a BK judge over Steenland and Co. any day. Please explain how things worked out any different for the pilots for not supporting the strike?
....
Northwest Airlines is basically a "do-over" at this point.
First off, all "Legacy" carriers are essentially a "do-over". At least, if they want to survive. On both the mgmt and labor side, the old carriers have a lot of baggage. Old school ideas on labor relations. Old school buisness practices. Old school pensions. On the labor side there are Unions that fight for crappy, lazzy employee jobs (mechs, pilots, FA's, gate agents, rampies, etc. Unproductive work rules that hurt EVERYONE (granted, alot of that is the result of crappy mgmt relations). And unions like AMFA that don't see the writing on the wall.
As for what would have been different for the pilots? Mabey something, mabey nothing. The oportunity for change w/o bankruptcy was lost along time ago. ALPA realized it, the others didn't. If 2 years ago, all the unions worked with the company (that is, if mgmt would have worked with them- see above "old school mgmt"), froze the defined bennies, came up with entirely new work rules, and bit of a pay cut, things could have been different (see AA). Some people would of lost their jobs forever (AC cleaners). That sucks. But, that's life, if you don't educate yourself and work hard, you can not expect life long success. Hell, even if you do, you can get screwed.
Bottom line, AMFA screwed themsleves by giving up scope, their week financial position, and the BS rhetoric. And pissing and crapping in the water tanks (etc, etc,) was a graphic example of how stupid some of those guys are (although I think most of the blame in on AMFA leadership)..