SilverSurfer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Posts
- 305
Like B19
After reading your post on this board, like B19, I think trying to reason with you is just pi$$ing in the wind, but I have a few comments reference your post.
You are damn right it obvious! Its supposed to be obvious! Its supposed to be obvious to management that the pilots are unhappy with them. When management makes the pilots happy via a signed contract it will be equally obvious that we are happy. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to break the code on this equation.
I don't think the word "quality" is the proper characterization of a pilots preflight choices. A "comprehensive, in depth" preflight vs a "oh I didn't see that" preflight that gets the live leg done or moves the jet to MX. What you don't want to recognize or acknowledge is that this is entirely the crews prerogative and they are completely legal and within their rights. If management wants pilots that are willing to look the other way on occasion then management needs to do what the pilots want, plain and simple. They scratch our back we scratch theirs.
And in the future if you are going to quote anything I post do not insert your assumptive editorial. A pilot choosing to apply the letter of the law is entirely his call and his right. It is not abuse.
Don't you see?
And as far as the "list" goes, if you're all so intent that it's just to examine the aorcraft for airworthiness, why does the emphasis on a "quality preflight" only come up when things go sour with the union-management relations? Its so obvious...
That's my point, ******************************-bags.
After reading your post on this board, like B19, I think trying to reason with you is just pi$$ing in the wind, but I have a few comments reference your post.
You are damn right it obvious! Its supposed to be obvious! Its supposed to be obvious to management that the pilots are unhappy with them. When management makes the pilots happy via a signed contract it will be equally obvious that we are happy. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to break the code on this equation.
I don't think the word "quality" is the proper characterization of a pilots preflight choices. A "comprehensive, in depth" preflight vs a "oh I didn't see that" preflight that gets the live leg done or moves the jet to MX. What you don't want to recognize or acknowledge is that this is entirely the crews prerogative and they are completely legal and within their rights. If management wants pilots that are willing to look the other way on occasion then management needs to do what the pilots want, plain and simple. They scratch our back we scratch theirs.
And in the future if you are going to quote anything I post do not insert your assumptive editorial. A pilot choosing to apply the letter of the law is entirely his call and his right. It is not abuse.
Last edited: