Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

mil turboprop vs. civ jet experience

  • Thread starter Thread starter skywiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 14

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Kit Darby is a weasel who feeds on the naivete of young green pilots who are promised much greener pastures and wind up with a bucket of sour milk! Cheers
 
My wife and my Sooners are the only ones who bring me happiness anymore, flying is just a job now!
 
Divide and Conquer. I wonder how many read these posts and think, great, there fighting amongst each other now.

Flying 135 light twins around single pilot IFR 6 days a week, 5 hours a day in an area that has 4 seasons is probably the hardest flying there is. It is a baptism by fire.

Total flight time represents how much time you have spent in the air dealing with Thunderstorms, Ice, Freezing rain, Ice covered runways, de-icing, developing weather skills, flight planing, and after 5000 hours they probably figure you have had your share of in flight emergencies, and learned a few things the hard way.

As far as who is the "more qualified" it is a toss. There are good reasons to hire each. But time in the air is just that.

As far as Turboprop time SWA offers a reduced rate for those with 1500 hours Turbine.

SWA – 2500 TT w/1000 turbine, or 1500 turbine.

Many Major airlines only count 121/135 time. No flight instruction or personal time. So there are allot of guys that can cut their TT in half. So I think the scales have been leveled pretty fairly.

Mark

 
Be careful what you wish for...

:-) said:
I have over 8 years in a Part25 airplanes. I think I'll call up the Pentagon and demand that they put me into the left seat of a C17 immediately if not sooner. With me having all of the heavy time I've got, I see no reason to waste my time flying anything lesser in the military fleet.

Do you guys think I've got a chance, or will I have to demean myself and fly a T1 first?

Note: Calvin's just joshing you army brats. I love you, and thank you for your service.

Hobbes
I'm normally much more comfortable reading vice writing on these forums. But since it's Sat. night and I'm drunk off my as$I figured what the hel1, these folks need to hear what the grotesque, hairy, Navy kid has to say.

Although I can't speak for C-17s precisely, I do know they they are deployed like friggin' crazy. If you really think you should get direct commission into military aviation; think again.

If you're Navy, plan on living a three year sea tour in which you're away from your family at least one full year during which you learn the true definition of the term "cruise sock". And while you're flying, consider the hazards of missiles, shipboard flying, and the inherent risks of flying really old, really sh1tty airframes well past their intended lifespans.

I have a lot of respect for pilots that work their way up through the civilian ranks. But if you wonder why us military guys don't want to pay our dues (again) flying at the regionals for $20K a year, you need to walk a mile in our shoes to comprehend. My wife has already been through the ringer and would much rather see me get a jobby job (shudder...) than to go through another 3 years of austerity. `Cause austerity is all I've had to offer her so far.

XXXOOO
 
skywiz said:
Enigma,

that CFI is qualified enough for a regional job, then why would an ex mil pilot expect or accept that fact that they need to spend time at a regional??? - this is my whole point. Put the pieces together. Nothing personal.

-skywiz
I think things need to be brought into perspective. Hiring is a function of the economy and market demand (read demand for pilots). All of which is cyclical. In 1998, with 8 years+ flying fixed wing in the military you could expect to go straight to the majors, but that is not the case right now. The industry fluctuates month to month. Heck, there are 15 year US Air pilots on the street right now.

That being said, you will have to make a decision based on the options you have. Skywiz, from your profile and previous posts, I am guessing you have just completed the FRS and possibly on your first tour. If I remember correctly your committment is something like 9 years (they change it all the time) from winging. The industry will turn over multiple times before you have the option of even considering a major or a regional. I applaud the fact that you are looking towards the future, but there is no way of telling what your options will be that far down the road. All you can do is do your job and hope that when you get out you are competitive for a major (whatever the definition of major will be then).

If you can go straight to a major, great! Who woudn't? If that is not an option due to the economy, then you will have to decide whether you are willing to take a pay cut and bide your time at a regional, or drop flying and take a real job (I personnaly passed up ~$100K in defense contracting...no regrets). Military pilots are making those decisions right now. Regionals are very competitve right now, with thousands of resumes on file. Sure the F-14 pilot and AV-8B pilot in my class at a regional are biding their time, waiting for the call (hopefully) from SWA or JB, but I just flew with a retired B-52 pilot who flew at my regional for 15 years after retiring from the AF. He got out when no majors were hiring and took the "temporary" regional job. When the majors were hiring, he had enough seniority to have a great lifestyle, so he decided to stay put. He had no regrets. My father-in-law retired from the AF in the early 90s as an F-4 pilot. Guess what he got stuck doing until he finally got hired by an LCC...CFIing in a cesna.

Its all about available options and the choices you make.

P.S. When you get into the right seat of an airline, it really doesn't matter what got you there. Your past will make for conversation on that 4 day trip, but nobody really cares too much. I have flown with some great CFI only captains and some sh!tty prior mil captains, and vice versa. There are all types in aviation, and I know from being a mil instructor that not all pilots in the mil should be pilots.

Good luck.
 
Great Post Tubelo

You hit it in the head, that nasty old supply and demand keeps getting the way of our plans.
 
Guys Guys Guys,

Forget the aircraft type for a moment. ATTITUDE is what gets you in.

Sure, SWA had for a while the "Luke Mafia" on the DB that let in all their buddies. But now the interview team is much much larger and diverse.

The problem is simple and applies to both civilian and military guys: If you come in assuming you know all the answers you'll quickly develop a reputation. Even if you flew the 737 before, you're now in a new airline, new airplane, new procedures, new personnel. Most importantly, a new way we do things.

If the colonel can't separate himself from whatever command he had and settle into yanking gear for someone else and learning the new ropes, then he'll have problems. Same thing applies if an RJ captain comes in and allows his experience level to end at the RJ and not realize this again is a new ball game.

Attitude my friends, if you're equiped with a bad one you're probably not going to get in in the first place.

I've flown great guys from the military and great guys from the civilan world. Also flew with some real rubes on both sides. From a ratio perspective it's a little more likely to get a pain in the neck colonel. I think that's because they're just used to having the last word.
 
tubelo said:
....................
If you can go straight to a major, great! Who woudn't? If that is not an option due to the economy, then you will have to decide whether you are willing to take a pay cut and bide your time at a regional, or drop flying and take a real job (I personnaly passed up ~$100K in defense contracting...no regrets). Military pilots are making those decisions right now. Regionals are very competitve right now, with thousands of resumes on file. Sure the F-14 pilot and AV-8B pilot in my class at a regional are biding their time, waiting for the call (hopefully) from SWA or JB,

................
Its all about available options and the choices you make.
................
Tubelo,Great Post. That's what I was trying to say when I wrote this in my original reply.
enigma said:
Brother, I know too many military trained fighter pilots who started out their civilian career at the regional/commuter level to have any sympathy for you.
The original post came across like this. I'm worried that those RJ guys and all of their glass cockpit experience will be given a better shot than will I with my military t-prop time and I don't think that is fair. I don't think that I should have to go to a regional. My P3 time should get me straight to a major.

My point was that I know plenty of military trained pilots, even fighter pilots, who went to a regional. They did what they had to do and I don't remember hearing any whining. Matter of fact, once upon a time, I was in a 19 seat turboprop commuter initial gs with a Strike Eagle pilot, a B52 pilot and an Ardvark pilot. Those guys were glad to have a flying job. So was I.

regards,
enigma
 
Even fighter pilots? Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't a P-3, T-1, C-130, or C-141 dude be a bit more qualified to transition to a a major airline than a fighter dude?
 
miles otoole said:
Even fighter pilots? Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't a P-3, T-1, C-130, or C-141 dude be a bit more qualified to transition to a a major airline than a fighter dude?
Well, you'd think so. But. I've been around long enough to know that the zoomies are considered the best of the best. Besides, they didn't get the F14 because they finished LAST in their class, now did they?

regards,
enigma
 
In that they have experience working with a crew and the fighter guys work alone.

But if you go by your post, then an RJ pilot should get preference over any military guy because he knows the civilian system and has several years flying within the airline system, working with an airline crew, dealing with airline passengers, the airline mentality, airline ground crews, etc.

Why a purely military guy thinks flying a tanker around in circles should put him at the top of the airline list is just arrogant, and that's where a lot of the civilian vs. military argument comes from. So you can fly an F-16, that's great. But get over it. You're not in an F-16 now. You've got a boatload of families, grandmothers, and nervous fliers who don't need to pull three g's leaving the traffic pattern.

The key is diversity. I don't want to see any exclusivity on any sub-specialty. And that's what all aviation is, a series of subspecialties. Military, corporate, regional, charter; it's all part of the same thing.

Just remember, when you get called for an interview that means you're qualified for the job, otherwise they wouldn't have called you. It's what you do when you get there that matters.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom