Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

MaxBlast feeling the LUV!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Uh Malcom, the SWA guys are defending themselves, take Ty's BS response:

"Our health insurance is about the same cost as yours.... And it's better coverage.... And if you read his post again, he already factored that in... That's what "take-home pay" means."

Of course the health insurance is better at AAI, everything is right? Hey a former FAT told me the monthly deductible was $400+ for Health Ins and at SWA it's half that...SWA folks on here are responding to the BS put out by the AAI mob...and it is true a 717 guy has to adjust to the 737 energy management

There is absolutely NOTHING to "argue".

First... why are you "Professionals" arguing about anything?

Second.... You all are comparing AirTran CAPTAIN pay to SWA FIRST OFFICER Pay. That fact that you can even attempt to make that "comparison" alone settles that debate. Next?

My post was in regards to ANY SWA Pilot that wants to post anything about Former AirTran Pilot flying skills... -300 or not. Posting that garbage online will fly right back and bite you in the @ss and accomplishes nothing.

For the love of it all.... please stop with this stuff. Go outside, get laid....

For gods sake find out how/why you feel it is appropriate to fight anonymously online about EVERYTING and disparage each other for 3 SOLID years since the announcement of the acquisition. You all work for the same company now and do the SAME JOB.... with MY family in the back.
 
"For gods sake find out how/why you feel it is appropriate to fight anonymously online about EVERYTING and disparage each other for 3 SOLID years since the announcement of the acquisition. You all work for the same company now and do the SAME JOB."

Agree 100%, and it is damn good job and we are all lucky to have one at SWA...
 
Uh Malcom, the SWA guys are defending themselves, take Ty's BS response:

"Our health insurance is about the same cost as yours.... And it's better coverage.... And if you read his post again, he already factored that in... That's what "take-home pay" means."

http://forums.flightinfo.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=2429914Of course the health insurance is better at AAI, everything is right? Hey a former FAT told me the monthly deductible was $400+ for Health Ins and at SWA it's half that..t

That guy must have some family members with some special needs, and opted for the most expensive, non-HMO plan.

I just looked at my 9-25-13 paystub. Family of four, mid-level HMO, $110.50 per pay period.
 
Last edited:
Use the rates prior to purchase and you come out ahead as a SWA FO. Oh the humanity.

Since you want to keep bringing up our 2001 Contract rates, I am looking for yours. Apples to apples, and all . . . . . .

Your 2001 FO rates were not very impressive. Anyone have the CA rates?

FIRST OFFICER
Year in
Service
9/1/94 9/1/99 9/1/00 9/1/01 9/1/02 9/1/03 9/1/04
1 $30.11 $31.01 $31.94 $32.90 $33.89 $34.91 $36.65
2 $50.80 $52.32 $53.89 $55.51 $57.18 $58.89 $61.84
3 $56.56 $58.25 $60.00 $61.80 $63.65 $65.56 $68.84
4 $62.44 $64.31 $66.24 $68.23 $70.27 $72.38 $76.00
5 $68.39 $70.44 $72.55 $74.73 $76.97 $79.28 $83.24
6 $70.31 $72.42 $74.59 $76.83 $79.13 $81.51 $85.58
7 $71.12 $73.25 $75.45 $77.71 $80.04 $82.44 $86.56
8 $71.93 $74.08 $76.31 $78.60 $80.95 $83.38 $87.55
9 $72.75 $74.93 $77.18 $79.49 $81.88 $84.33 $88.55
10 $73.55 $75.76 $78.03 $80.37 $82.78 $85.27 $89.53
11 $74.36 $76.59 $78.89 $81.26 $83.70 $86.21 $90.52
12 $75.17 $77.43 $79.75 $82.14 $84.61 $87.15 $91.50
 
Last edited:
How about we keep this honest and use the rates on the date of the purchase.

Or why don't we use your 1992 rates compared to ours.
 
How about we keep this honest and use the rates on the date of the purchase.

Or why don't we use your 1992 rates compared to ours.

You guys are the ones who keep bringing up our 2001 Contract rates, which would be 12 years old now.

Here are yours, for comparison.

Wow. When you convert yours for TFP, it looks like our 12th year pay was almost exactly the same as yours . . . ours was $152./hr.

Oh, the humanity, indeed. :D


9/1/2001 9/1/2002 9/1/2003 9/1/2004



Yr 1 $109.68 $112.97 $116.36 $122.17
Yr 2 $111.02 $114.35 $117.78 $123.67
Yr 3 $112.37 $115.74 $119.21 $125.17
Yr 4 $113.71 $117.12 $120.63 $126.67
Yr 5 $114.97 $118.41 $121.97 $128.07
Yr 6 $116.41 $119.90 $123.50 $129.67
Yr 7 $117.74 $121.27 $124.91 $131.16
Yr 8 $119.09 $122.66 $126.34 $132.65
Yr 9 $120.44 $124.05 $127.78 $134.16
Yr 10 $121.77 $125.43 $129.19 $135.65
Yr 11 $123.12 $126.81 $130.62 $137.15
Yr 12 $124.46 $128.20 $132.04 $138.64
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top