Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Massive furloughs at Polar

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Flight schedule is still showing the entire Polar Classic Fleet flying well into September. Hmmm....:confused:
 
heilhaavir said:
Not exactly true Classicdriver, 1 Polaroid went there in Feb and 2 in March... Good timing I might add :)

I stand corrected. He must have spoken with forked tongue. This was an FE kind of Focus guy? He spoke in general terms. Could the three whose timing is awesome be pilots?
 
RideandDrive said:
April 18, 2006

Unfortunately, given the Crew inefficiencies, it is just not economically viable to operate a Classic fleet of this size. Faced with this reality, we are left with no choice but to park the Polar Classic fleet effective July 1.


I know this raises the question of why Polar can efficiently operate a –400 fleet of only five aircraft, yet we can’t be as Crew efficient with the Classics. The answer lies in the fact that the -400s are used exclusively for scheduled service, where we can control the use of the aircraft and we can do so in a manner that ensures efficient Crew utilization. This is not the case with the Classic, however, where the ad hoc nature of the flying in which we place these aircraft makes them very Crew inefficient.


We have a successful airline and we are going to continue to have a successful airline going forward…. but only if we face up to the realities of our business and deal with the hard challenges as they occur, not ignore them and find ourselves in the position where any action we might take is too late to make a difference.

.

I get it!!! It's the fault of the crews that they have a successful airline and have to get furloughed!!!

Perfectly clear to me...going backward to go forward...

I wish you guys the best of luck-
 
Last edited:
Serrano,

I think what the MAN was refering to was the fact that they cannot ddeal with the fact that Polar actually has a contract that means something and doesn't allow them to compete effectively in the Ad Hoc side of the Biz. He's probably correct since all the new start ups basically have no work rules besides those that the FAA mandates! Which is probably only one step below how they view the Atlas contract.

Someone once said that no matter how you feel about unions the companies that have them deserve them!

All of the startups will have them if they survive that long.

MY.02 your milage may vary.
Bman
 
Yep,

Atlas/Polar scheduling can't come to grips with the Polar CBA to schedule efficiently according to contract and cargo demand. Company has to pay for changes at Polar versus Atlas contract scheduling works. AAWW loves the Atlas contract. Plenty of wholes in it. We had the great support of Polar and the replacement crew leasing company AACS in Stansted U.K. to thank for a lot of what we all (Polar and Atlas) now have to live with.

Take a look at the flashplayer slide show AT THIS WEB SITE that was shown to the ALPA Executive Board a couple of months back. Give's you kind of a run down on the true relationship/events between Polar and Atlas.

So while Polar was taking a dump on Atlas crews in a number of ways, they were also taking a dump on themselves in the end. You'll never get them to admit that though.

Judging from reports in the field, a number of Polar guys have been taking it very personal on their furlough notice and have been getting a verbally abusive to the Atlas guys. Vibes from the company have been indicating that they may turn a number of those furloughs into terminations for harassment. That looks great on a resume. It's not rocket science to figure out who was where on a certain date. With crew pictures in digital format, it doesn't take long finding the offenders.

I'm certain someone will have too many bottles of liquid courage at a joint Polar/Atlas hotel bar and end up getting their teeth pulled out of someone elses knuckles.

My real reason for posting:

Talked to the Atlas guy that was running the jobs committee at Council 072. He said he would probably help if required to by his MEC, but he said he would be pulling his personal public jobs page down because of Polars behaviour pre and post Polar strike to Atlas crews. Said he would be advising the current employment recruiters he communicates with of the situation also. I'm guessing from his tone that he won't be recommending Polar crewmembers to them. I don't think that will prevent Polar guys from being hired, but that may make them the last ones to get interviewed.

Kind of a shame. Not only do the Polar guys loose out on a resource, but also the general pilot population that used his site. Site was up to over 65000 hits from when it started back in 2001 he said.
 
Last edited:
Can't We All Get Along?

I really don't get where all the hostilities towards the Atlas crewmembers come from? Everytime something doesn't go well for the Polaroids, they attack the Atlas crews, look at that mess of a strike they had, it was a Polar strike, not Atlas, but they harrassed only the Atlas pilots, none of the other ALPA carriers (NWA, UAL, FedEx, or UPS) were harrassed going into hotels or for flying THEIR own freight. Whenever I come across a Polar crew somewhere in the world, I always try to be professional and say hello, but most of the time the response I get from them are usually a scowl or dirty looks, so now my attitude is F*** You too! If they really want to teach management a lesson , why don't they do us all a favour and go on strike again, over the announced fleet reduction and furlough!

I really feel bad for the couple of friends of mine that fly for Polar, and will support those individuals in their endeavours after Polar. I don't want this to be a Polar bashing thread, but I just get fed up with the anger towards us Atlas Pilots, they make it look like we're the bad guys, but it's management that makes the big decisions, not us!
 
The old saw

B747FR8DAWG said:
I really don't get where all the hostilities towards the Atlas crewmembers come from? Everytime something doesn't go well for the Polaroids, they attack the Atlas crews, ...

Misery loves company.
 
cfire said:
My real reason for posting:

Talked to the Atlas guy that was running the jobs committee at Council 072. He said he would probably help if required to by his MEC, but he said he would be pulling his public jobs page down because of Polars behaviour pre and post Polar strike to Atlas crews. Said he would be advising the current employment recruiters of the situation also. I'm guessing from his tone that he won't be reccommending Polar crewmembers to them.

Kind of a shame. Not only the Polar guys loose out on a resource, but also the general pilot population that used his site. Site was up to over 65000 hits from when it started back in 2001 he said.

Some info for your High Horseness:

Other than the engineers, most of the Polar guys furloughed will be the ones hired by Atlas and trained in joint classes with Atlas crew members. Polar and Atlas crews trained together for the first two weeks until they were split off.

Additionally nobody knew where they were going (Polar/Atlas) until called for class dates. For the past couple of years the interview was for BOTH airlines conducted by BOTH CP's.

Also I would estimate that around 60 to 70% are furloughees from major carriers. (My class represented AA,UAL,DAL,USAir, alone) Your genorosity torward pilots that were not even on the property during your beef with Polar at your last contract is greatly appreciated. Maybe we can return the favor once we are recalled to our respective majors.;)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top