Typical response from the ALPA bleachers....and you wonder why you aren't taken seriously...You failed to address any of the issues I raised.....instead you attacked me because I dared to question the almighty ALPA....I have been through ALPA leadership training and that is the one thing they teach you...Protect ALPA at any cost....
Joe, you are an angry, bitter pilot. You are so pissed off that I don't think you are capable of coherent thought. Seriously.
First of all, as I have stated REPEATEDLY, I am not an ALPA cheerleader. I'm a guy that wishes we didn't even need unions, but in this industry that is not realistic. I've worked at union and non-union airlines/entities. It's a no-brainer. I'll take imperfect ALPA over nothing. Show me a union better than ALPA and I'll personally start the drive at my airline myself. If that's your definition of an "ALPA cheerleader" then I don't know what to tell you.
And then you make these points, some of them valid, mostly not, then imply, "look flightinfo.com readers, here are some of ALPA's failures, therefore invalidating any contribution ALPA has made, currently makes, and will make in the future." Then you go off on these anti-ALPA tirades and brag about not paying dues, sending back postage paid cars, etc. ALPA is a pretty big organization. ANY big organization has its failings. Again, to only point out ALPA's failings, and then try to invalidate the whole organization because of those failings is ridiculous. There is no large organization on the planet that could survive that scrutiny. That's why I say you can't see the forest for the trees.
Then you make some ridiculous leap about the Deregulation Act and how ALPA failed there because it typically supports Democrats. Joe, there are two, sometimes 3 parties to choose from. What is a union supposed to do, support "...pilots are greedy and unpatriotic....." McCain because Kennedy pushed for deregulation 30 years ago? Maybe, just maybe, no candidate is necessarily perfect so you pick the candidate that will best further your organization's goals? And maybe, just maybe, just because YOU don't agree with ALPA's political choice that it doesn't invalidate the whole organization?
On point 2, yup ALPA membership screwed up the outsourcing of RJ's. Obviously with the hindsight of 20/20 not one ALPA airline should have relaxed scope. Period. Does that mean ALPA is a totally useless organization now? Nope, I don't think so. Again, you're so bitter and angry, you fail to see EVERYTHING else ALPA has done, currently does, and will do in the future. I can't wait for the, "oh yeah, tell me
one thing ALPA has done for me lately," I'm sure to read as a reply.....
On point 3, a total failure by ALPA to regulate? GMAFB. I didn't realize ALPA wrote the FARs or dictated to our legislative branch. I thought it was a union that
influences said organizations. So because Prater/Woerth/Babbitt/whoever else didn't march into the halls of Congress and say, "this is how it's going to be," ALPA has totally failed? Why couldn't I own a handgun in Chicago, Joe? Is the NRA a total failure because it didn't march into my state's legislature and tell them how it's going to be? Why couldn't business jets fly into DCA for years after 9/11? Why did flight schools go out of business under the DC ADIZ when they couldn't fly their planes? Why are general aviation airports closing all over the country? The AOPA must be a failure because it didn't regulate properly, right? Yet these are organizations that you have previously described as successes. How can that be? Because you're so bitter and angry, you can't see the difference.
Why hasn't ALPA ever pushed for a 1500 hr. requirement? You have to have willing parties on the other end of the negotiation to make stuff happen. Nobody cared until Buffalo. That argument is the same lame argument some anti-ALPA, angry furloughees make about getting laid off. Why didn't ALPA get me longevity? Why didn't ALPA get a buyout for the senior guys? Why didn't ALPA negotiate lower line caps to keep people on the property? It's the same reason. ALPA can "want" all day and night sometimes. If the other guy doesn't want to discuss it with you, you aren't getting anything. Just because the entity on the opposite side of the table isn't interested in discussing a particular item with you, doesn't make ALPA a failed organization.
Why did ALPA support MPL? Maybe, just maybe, they thought an inexperienced pilot going through a MPL program would be better than a 250 hr. wonder coming through All ATP's. Maybe they thought that they could influence MPL legislation, structure, and oversight, and make the profession better. I've argued that the whole MPL thing is a moot point. Either way, you've got an inexperienced pilot shelling out $80K for training. One emphasizes airline operations from the get go, one has you drilling holes in the sky on VFR cross countries. Both spit out pilots from the opposite end that have no business sitting in the right seat of an airliner. So ALPA chooses to support the MPL path instead of the All ATP's path, and you don't agree with that? Whether you think it's right or wrong, that makes ALPA a failure?
Then you say, "no other organization supports low experience." Really? Have you ever been to hospital, only to be seen by a Resident or an intern? I have. Does that mean the AMA supports inexperienced medical professionals treating patients? Are you familiar with the financial planning industry? How about the insurance industry? Inexperienced professionals in those professions give important advice every day of the week. Does that mean FINRA, the SEC, and the state's insurance commission "support inexperienced professionals" giving important financial and insurance advice? They aren't actively supporting it just because it exists. I'm sure if you asked ALPA leadership, they would prefer to have 10,000 hour, experienced pilots in every cockpit. I'm sure if you asked FINRA, the SEC, and your state's insurance entity, they'd rather have experienced professionals with 10 years on the job providing you with financial/insurance advice. But that doesn't mean they're "supporting" inexperienced players. It's a lame argument from a bitter, angry pilot doing anything he can to disparage ALPA.
Do you see a pattern here, Joe? You have one guy who realizes that ALPA is an imperfect organization run by imperfect pilots, but despite those failings, still sees value in ALPA going forward. And then you have another bitter, angry pilot illustrating a few of ALPA's failings, mf'ing ALPA every chance he has, name calling, and writing off the whole organization as useless, all the while enjoying the union benefits of a 6 figure salary and 18 days off a month. Kind of hypocritical, if you ask me.
So this "ALPA cheerleader" isn't dodging questions, Joe. He has, however, just wasted 20 minutes of his life that he'll never get back.