flyjetspeed
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Posts
- 109
Njasap
In keeping with the subject title of this thread it seems to me that the idea of any union purporting to speak for an entire industry, or even a segment of one, is self serving at best. As Boston's Tip O'Neill used to say "All politics is local." Every collective bargaining unit engages in negotiations to obtain the best deal for its own constituency and no other. Sometimes this will result in collateral effects outside the “local” participants and NJW’s “rising tide” comes in, as it has at CS, but this is only incidental.
Each group must deal with a set of completely unique circumstances, i.e. different management, different profit margins, different scale of operations, different stakeholders, etc. For one organization, weather it be IBT, ALPA, AFL-CIO, or any other, to represent each group equally is simply not possible. The NJA pilots group, by itself, has made its best deal with NetJets Inc. and the Flight Options pilot group is at liberty to do the same. Quite honestly, as Japan has shown us, business is war. Our company is actively engaged in taking as many of Flight Options customers, employees, and profits away from them as possible, logically to the point that Flight Options is eliminated as a competitor. So be it and solidarity be damned. I believe the NJA pilots are making the right move in separating from the IBT because the Teamster's have no interest in them other than their dues. Any attempt to rejoin the Flight Options pilots in a common union after the split with IBT would be a disservice to both groups. Only vested self interest can produce the kind of success achieved at NJA in negotiating a contract at Flight Options and it is the Flight Options pilots to win or lose that struggle. Just my .02
In keeping with the subject title of this thread it seems to me that the idea of any union purporting to speak for an entire industry, or even a segment of one, is self serving at best. As Boston's Tip O'Neill used to say "All politics is local." Every collective bargaining unit engages in negotiations to obtain the best deal for its own constituency and no other. Sometimes this will result in collateral effects outside the “local” participants and NJW’s “rising tide” comes in, as it has at CS, but this is only incidental.
Each group must deal with a set of completely unique circumstances, i.e. different management, different profit margins, different scale of operations, different stakeholders, etc. For one organization, weather it be IBT, ALPA, AFL-CIO, or any other, to represent each group equally is simply not possible. The NJA pilots group, by itself, has made its best deal with NetJets Inc. and the Flight Options pilot group is at liberty to do the same. Quite honestly, as Japan has shown us, business is war. Our company is actively engaged in taking as many of Flight Options customers, employees, and profits away from them as possible, logically to the point that Flight Options is eliminated as a competitor. So be it and solidarity be damned. I believe the NJA pilots are making the right move in separating from the IBT because the Teamster's have no interest in them other than their dues. Any attempt to rejoin the Flight Options pilots in a common union after the split with IBT would be a disservice to both groups. Only vested self interest can produce the kind of success achieved at NJA in negotiating a contract at Flight Options and it is the Flight Options pilots to win or lose that struggle. Just my .02