Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Letterman "Top 10" NWA overflight

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I get the part about losing situational awareness. What I don't get is when did mobs and pitchforks replace due process and innocent until proven guilty.

What overriding social need was served by a public emergency revocation?

Why have ASAP? All it does is deny the public it's right to justice!
 
Lear,

Once again, I agree with you. I remember my flying days before I came to the dark side of the force. On those long flights you find ways to keep occupied. I think you hit the nail on the head when you wrote about BOTH pilots not flying the plane.
 
What overriding social need was served by a public emergency revocation?

Why have ASAP? All it does is deny the public it's right to justice!


I don't know that an "overriding social need" was served by the revocation. I definately think there was careless operation of an aircraft involved and you might be able to argue reckless operation. The FAA has the right for emergency revocation when public safety is involved.

That being said, when the FAA does revoke a certificate, they usually have GOOD reason to do so. Now, with the political/public climate after Colgan, I think politics had some part in the revocation, but I also think there's more to the story than we're hearing.

ASAP is a great program. However, I'm 99% certain that ASAP would not have protected them. There are certain criteria that must be met with ASAP, one of which is no 'intentional' disregard for safety. I doubt that they could get past that one.
 
With the "laptop use" being the cornerstone for there lapse in SA, a search warrant and a computer nerd can look to see if the laptops were even on, and what they were looking at..........the laptop story and the fear of no cockpit laptop use will go away......they were saw'in some serious logs.........
If they were smarter, they should have fessed up, said we had both fallen asleep due to fatigue. If they had an easy schedule and the lack crew rest was bogus, then claim they both suffer from sleep apnea and are trying to work with a disability.
The FAA does not require sleep apnea to be divulged or discused on a medical.
 
I DO think this is the FAA attempting to make a bold statement to the public about how 'serious' they are about safety. I also think the punishment is likely out of line given the outcome. Still, guys were buffoons no matter how you slice it, and the Letterman stuff was funny.

I'm Bald, from NJ [originally], and a Pilot. I'm open season for jokesters if anything ever comes my way...
 
I think Lear hit it on the head. It wasn't the fact that they were NORDO per se, it was the length of time they were NORDO, the fact that they had so lost SA that they apparently did not recognize they were NORDO until an FA attracted their attention, the fact that they were so out of the loop that they over flew their destination without realizing it while NORDO, etc. One has to wonder exactly how far they would have gone had the FA not intervened.

One could argue that they didn't intentionally lose SA, but by intentionally engaging in an activity that they arguably should have know might harm their SA I think it can be argued their actions were, in fact, careless and reckless, thus the ER.

We might also consider that while these guys got a big scare, and a suspension might sufficiently reinforce it for them, the ER is get the attention of the rest of us as to how serious this situation was and how much worse it could have been.

Nobody got hurt, but it certainly wasn't because of the professionalism and skill of these two
 
Last edited:
Every single pilot has on at least one occasion lost radio contact due to frequency change issues.

Some pilots have commenced descent to destination late due to distractions, inattention, or poor planning.

Few if any pilots (until now) have overflown destination completely oblivious to their position.

The only technology that should have been contributory to this incident is a misprogrammed FMS. Apparently by the crew's own admissions that was not the case. I would suggest that their own statements, whether factual or not, have been their undoing.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top