Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

LAS Picket huge success

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hogprint said:
Not so fast dsptchr...

The company says it will support fatiqued calls with a memo from just gary. Then, wink wink nod nod, the acps try to coerce you into not calling in fatiqued, and worse, lots, I repeat, LOTS of pilots have done a bridgeway 1 arrival over fatique calls.

They can't have it both ways. Either they support us or they don't.

To answer you last statement. There have been pilots released for calling in fatiqued. Go back and check with your sources. I know you don't want to believe the company would do it, but they have proven they are very capable of this sort of intimidation.

My best advice, for what it's worth, is for crews to not give anyone a reason to suspect they are lying. In light of the current labor situation some are possibly taking a legitimate rule and manipulating it to fit their agenda. If you guys want to play that game, don't get surprised by a sudden BWY1 arrival. Everyone knows I am not talking about legitimate fatigue issues here. Trust me, ACP's have better things to do than take more time during their busy day to "counsel" bad boys. ACP's are not stupid, they can figure out who's playing by the real rules if you make it obvious.
 
dsptchrNJA said:
My best advice, for what it's worth, is for crews to not give anyone a reason to suspect they are lying.


You talk to professional crewmembers like we are summer camp. Your expert advise goes under the "No sh!t Sherlock" category. Thanks for that earthshattering newsflash. NJA pilots around the world will never be the same now that we have you as our advisor. Anything else while you're at it oh Oracle of CMH?
 
My advice to people receiving my calls concerning fatigue, sick, maintenance writeups is to realize I am in the aircraft with the APU and avionics turned on and sitting right next to the cockpit voice recorder mic while talking on my cellphone with the speakerphone turned on.
 
FLYLOW22 said:
You talk to professional crewmembers like we are summer camp. Your expert advise goes under the "No sh!t Sherlock" category. Thanks for that earthshattering newsflash. NJA pilots around the world will never be the same now that we have you as our advisor. Anything else while you're at it oh Oracle of CMH?

You want to push the envelope like a high school class clown... be prepared to be treated like one. My comments are only to those who are not playing by the rules in order to pursue a personal agenda. If you do not fit in this catagory than you have no reason to get defensive.

I think most of the "professional crewmembers" are staying clear of this board.
 
Last edited:
dsptchrNJA said:

dsptchrNJA said:
My best advice, for what it's worth, is for crews to not give anyone a reason to suspect they are lying. In light of the current labor situation some are possibly taking a legitimate rule and manipulating it to fit their agenda. If you guys want to play that game, don't get surprised by a sudden BWY1 arrival. Everyone knows I am not talking about legitimate fatigue issues here. Trust me, ACP's have better things to do than take more time during their busy day to "counsel" bad boys. ACP's are not stupid, they can figure out who's playing by the real rules if you make it obvious.

I'll say it again dspchr, the company can't have it both ways. They are either going to support fatique issues or they're not. It is their policy after all.

I agree ACPs are too busy for this. When a crew calls in fatiqued, then they are done. No questions asked. There should be no grey areas or second guessing.

How can you say a crew is lying about fatique anyway? If I'm tired. I'm tired.

Maybe, just maybe, if a scheduler were held accountable for some of these calls, then we could get to the root of the problem.

Do you see that happening anytime soon?
 
Some pilots do lie about fatigue

If you are tired, you are tired. But if you are not tired and using it for your Union political gain, then you are trying to have it both ways. How about when you claim being tired 30 min before you know when? Or if you find that you are being extended and then you claim you are tired. You need not worry because the company will always err of the side of safety, especially if you call fatigue and grant your wish. We wouldn’t want you falling asleep on the job.
 
Last edited:
Hogprint said:
I'll say it again dspchr, the company can't have it both ways. They are either going to support fatique issues or they're not. It is their policy after all.

I agree ACPs are too busy for this. When a crew calls in fatiqued, then they are done. No questions asked. There should be no grey areas or second guessing.

How can you say a crew is lying about fatique anyway? If I'm tired. I'm tired.

Maybe, just maybe, if a scheduler were held accountable for some of these calls, then we could get to the root of the problem.

Do you see that happening anytime soon?

The company has never had it both ways. They've always supported fatigue issues and you know it. Why do you guys even try to pretend you don't have ulterior motives? The rules haven't changed... so what has? Did some crewmembers just decide recently they were going to follow the rules all of sudden?

Why didn't as many crews call in before? That would be the real crux of the safety issue. But everyone reading these threads knows we are not talking about a safety issue, we are talking about a union agenda. This has already been made clear by a crewmember earlier in this post, quite voluntarily. No one has to wonder why the sudden increase.

When a crew calls in "I'm too tired", then yes there are no questions asked given all other things equal. I'm thinking any crew getting called to CMH didn't fit this category. If I'm wrong then I would be forced to agree with you there is a problem. I have yet to see any evidence of that.

I'm guessing crewmembers that are flying the same lines now as they did 2 or 6 years ago who didn't call in tired then, and now are suddenly tired a few times every tour... they are the ones raising yellow flags on themselves. I'm also guessing when the contract is passed the same crewmember will be delighted to fly the same lines he's calling in tired for now.

This is a personal integrity issue. Even if you are "tired" but not too tired to safely fly your passengers... and you call in fatigued anyway saying you're too tired... then you get bent out of shape with the company because you are being called into question... well, I guess that's just how the game is played. Maybe it would just be easier on everyone not to play those games.

The bottom line is you brought this on yourselves. Don't expect them to just roll over and not deal with crews who aren't going to play by the rules. Like I said they raise the yellow flag on themselves.

If so many crewmembers were flying too tired before, well, that's another issue. Just glad we didn't suffer the consequences.
 
NewsFlash Dispatcher and troll We have been flying fatigued and not complaining for years. After the recent firing of two fatigued pilots... don't think we can take this chance anymore.

What is the company doing to proactively prevent fatigued crews from flying airplanes?

A proposal is already out on the table to have a permanant Protected Rest time period.... A crew may be assigned 2200 to 0600E. This crew will then know that between those hours all tour long They will be in a hotel... not at the FBO not in a plane. Every day the whole tour long. No matter what. This is designed to protect circadian cycle. This is the proposal of the 135 ARC... The company is aware of it because they are on the ARC.

How about 12 hrs min rest periods? Shorter duty period limits.

How about FEWER work days... NOT MORE!
 
It sounds reasonable that a crew have the same 8 hurs protected resst for their entire tour. Be it 2200 – 0600 or 1800 – 0200. It makes sense. It just requires more pilots to cover the demand. Less work = less pay. I thought you wanted to increase your wages all that you could. So work fewer days and get paid less? That sounds opposite from what you have stated in the past. Why would you want to get paid less?
 
Someone who falls asleep due to being pushed all week by scheduling, does not merit being terminated.

El, anyone who falls asleep on the job - any job- for any reason would be fired.

think about it - firefighters work weird hours, if one falls asleep at a fire, he is fired. He can sleep while waiting for a call - but he better not fall asleep at 4 am while sitting in the truck at a fire even if his circadium rhythms are all screwed up.

Police officer works double duty- falls asleep in his car while parked at the side of the road - fired.

What job can I have that if I fall asleep I will not get fired?

If you come up with one, let us all know- I want THAT job!!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top