Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

L39 Albatros Crashes and Burns in AK Trailer Park, Pilot Ejected...

  • Thread starter Thread starter FN FAL
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 23

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Gorilla said:
This brings up a question I've always had... are private high-performance ex-military jets normally maintained with a functional ejection system? The reason this intrigues me is that ejection/egress is a highly specialized and labor-intensive form of maintenance. You are dealing with rockets, parachutes, and explosive belts and seat kickers. Probably requires a dangerous or hazardous materials license just to maintain the spares for the seat in your hangar.

As mentioned by a previous poster, there is one company and several individuals that will perform egress maintenance. The most difficult aspect is obtaining the rocket cartridges. Sourcing can be difficult and the BATF folks get involved with the paperwork. Interestingly enough, once the devices are installed in the seat, the ATF people could care less. They are very concerned about storage before that point.

It amazes me that the folks that purchase these aircraft don't take them seriouslly. Most jet warbirds are maintained without live seats, which simply astounds me. If it can't be deadsticked into a field without killing you, spend the money and have the seats.

R.I.P. for the pilot. Sad stuff.
 
flyguybri said:

USA is Kerlin's outfit? I thought it sounded familiar.

I met Kerlin and his wife several times very briefly at the World Freefall Convention in UIN and he seemed like a straight shooter and a real nice guy. Although there is the tragedy of the pilot's death, I would like to think that the other operator is just blowing smoke up the media's ass after some some sour grapes with Kirlin.
 
FN FAL said:
Here's an interesting article of the Ketchikan crash, apparently there was a "circling" manuver being done with 1/2 mile vis and 500 foot ceiling.

The article has some data on the pilot as well as some eyewitness accounts and photos.

I'm not familiar with Alaska flying or ketchikan airport, so I'm just forwarding the article for the thread, not speculating.


Well, the ILS at Ketchikan has a 1000 ft (straight in) DA for a sea level airport. that in itself should tell you something Circiling minimums *start* at 2500 and go up
 
A Squared said:
Well, the ILS at Ketchikan has a 1000 ft (straight in) DA for a sea level airport. that in itself should tell you something Circiling minimums *start* at 2500 and go up
Oh my...that's one reason why I tend to reserve judgement on AK flying or crashes.
 
FN FAL said:
Oh my...that's one reason why I tend to reserve judgement on AK flying or crashes.
Sorry if that sounds lame or phoney, but it's true...I know nothing about AK flying other than my perception that it's the opposite of flying in Iowa.
 
Ill Mitch said:
How about the Air USA site, who is the company that sold the airplanes. Red Air, tho owned by Kirlin, is a different company.

http://www.air-usa.com/

I don't have time to look at the two sites, is there two companies owned by Kirlin? If so, that's probably not unusual in business, especially high-risk aviation based businesses. It could even be because of regulatory or tax reasons.
 
FN FAL said:
I don't have time to look at the two sites, is there two companies owned by Kirlin? If so, that's probably not unusual in business, especially high-risk aviation based businesses. It could even be because of regulatory or tax reasons.

It looks like Air-USA is focused on selling communist bloc (L-39 and Chinese CJ-6) aircraft, while Red Air is focused on providing opposing forces for military training. They list their capabilities as:

•Air Intercept Training
•Air Defense Training
•Threat Simulation (Missle Search – Lock On – Track – Launch)
•Jamming (Air-To-Air & Air-To-Ground)
•Target Towing
•Utility Work
•ACM

They claim to have flown almost 1,000 sorties against the US Navy and several RCAF units.

I don't know why he set up two separate companies to perform these roles, although it could be for the reasons you mentioned, or to simplify some of the paperwork for defense contracts.
 
Last edited:
FN FAL said:
I don't have time to look at the two sites, is there two companies owned by Kirlin? If so, that's probably not unusual in business, especially high-risk aviation based businesses. It could even be because of regulatory or tax reasons.

Yup, two companies owned by Kirlin. Air USA and Red Air.
 
I don't know why he set up two separate companies to perform these roles, although it could be for the reasons you mentioned, or to simplify some of the paperwork for defense contracts.

Why does that seem strange? I dealt with Don for several years on many things relating to his businesses, and trust me, importing aircraft (Air USA)from former eastern-bloc countries can be difficult, sometimes intense, work. His contracting activities (Red Air) also involve dealing with enormous amounts of bureacracy. It's definitely not a case of any kind of smoke and mirrors. They are two different activities, hence two different businesses.

This is not meant as a defense or indictment of Don Kirlin, because I don't have any explanation for what happened on this particular day. I just wanted to throw a little more light on things here.

In any case, RIP Stephen
 
Sounds just like trying to eject outside of the envelope. And 10,000' is a T-38ism. ACESII seat can go lower. And a 0/0 doesnt mean you'll still survive. The time required by the seat might still be too much before your jet impacts the ground.

I'm happily surprised that there is a company that supports live seats for these types of jets. There is no way I'd fly one without a live seat. The guys flying Mig-21s without a live seat are just plain crazy.
 
Big Duke Six said:
Why does that seem strange? I dealt with Don for several years on many things relating to his businesses, and trust me, importing aircraft (Air USA)from former eastern-bloc countries can be difficult, sometimes intense, work. His contracting activities (Red Air) also involve dealing with enormous amounts of bureacracy. It's definitely not a case of any kind of smoke and mirrors. They are two different activities, hence two different businesses.

This is not meant as a defense or indictment of Don Kirlin, because I don't have any explanation for what happened on this particular day. I just wanted to throw a little more light on things here.

In any case, RIP Stephen
Rodger that.

I wouldn't second guess the other operator either, but it sounds like there was definitely some kind of bad blood between that other operator and Kirlin.

I have seen this type of craziness with other businessmen and their customers on the net, regarding a customer who thought they got a bad deal and began a smearing campaign. Which is funny, because I do business with said businessman and he provides primo product. It's interesting when you get to hear what Paul Harvey calls, "the rest of the story".

Obviously, this incident has more to it than just what one person says...
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom