~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
General :
I see your point. Your problem is that ALPA's ratification of your 2000 contract is under review in the Courts.
Besides, why do you think a US Air style jets for jobs program is the smart move to make? Please tell me of an example where this jets for jobs protocol has been a success?
Do you really want to come down here and slug it out with ASA, Comair, Eagle, Chautauqua, Skyway and Mesa to see who can fly the cheapest? Remember the US Air E170 pilots undercut the CC Air "hugely concessionary" contract and they make around $5.00 to $6.00 less than I do.
What is your MEC thinking - are they thinking?
~~~^~~~
I see your point. Your problem is that ALPA's ratification of your 2000 contract is under review in the Courts.
Besides, why do you think a US Air style jets for jobs program is the smart move to make? Please tell me of an example where this jets for jobs protocol has been a success?
Do you really want to come down here and slug it out with ASA, Comair, Eagle, Chautauqua, Skyway and Mesa to see who can fly the cheapest? Remember the US Air E170 pilots undercut the CC Air "hugely concessionary" contract and they make around $5.00 to $6.00 less than I do.
What is your MEC thinking - are they thinking?
~~~^~~~