Wikipedia is not a source. It is a great tool for hyperlinks to sources. I assume you know that. As for reliable, it is hard to ignore statements of fact of sociologigal principles pioneered by astute observers of human behavior.
It's Wikipedia, the most mislead and misread place on the internet... LOL!!
Obviously the point is you may be somewhat mistaken in your perception of yourself as confident and witty. More than one of us thought you came across as a condescending, self-indulgent if not somewhat narcissitic horse's ass.
Maybe you two or three should get a room and comfort each other.
But hey what do we know? This is flight info.
Probably the most intelligent comment you've made yet. There is a God!
By the way, best of luck with that interview you had. Targeted interviewing usually works out real well for guys with attitudes like yours.
You're the one with your panties in a wad. Hope you're not interviewing anytime soon. LOL!!
Perhaps you would be more comfy with a reference from the American Sociological Association:
http://www.asanet.org/page.ww?name=Charles+H.+Cooley§ion=Presidents
How about a simple Columbia Encylopedia entry:
Cooley, Charles Horton, 1864–1929, American sociologist,
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...... son of Thomas M. Cooley. He taught
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz after 1892, although his degree was in economics.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz the social determination of the self)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzz.........(1902, rev. ed. 1922),
Social Organization (1909),
Social Process (1918),
ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz.
Sorry! I even tried drinking coffee AND taking No-Doze before reading your little Wikipedia dissertation. It Didn't help.