Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

JC Resigns Comair MEC

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
John, sometimes I get the feeling that you just want to argue for the sake of arguing. Obviously the courts can't "force" you to pick up open time, but if the company goes to the courts with proof that open time pick-ups are down by 50% or whatever number, then the courts will fine the Association. The fines would probably be several million dollars.
 
John, sometimes I get the feeling that you just want to argue for the sake of arguing. Obviously the courts can't "force" you to pick up open time, but if the company goes to the courts with proof that open time pick-ups are down by 50% or whatever number, then the courts will fine the Association. The fines would probably be several million dollars.

...... no I just like throwing the BS flag when I see it...... and I see it alot from you......

So what if the Association get's fined...... If the majority of pilots cared about their fellow furloughed pilots, they would refuse to pick up open time, and there is nothing that anyone can do about that.... But the fact is, the majority only care about themselves, and you and I both know that.....

You continue to spew this utopian "brotherhood" BS, and the fact is, it simply does not exist.......
 
It's already been explained to me by Delta pilots in this thread that picking up open time during the furloughs was acceptable because the money was so good.
 
It's already been explained to me by Delta pilots in this thread that picking up open time during the furloughs was acceptable because the money was so good.

.....that's what this boils down to..... then they want to pontificate about other pilot groups doing what is "right" in the name of "brotherhood".....

:puke:
 
not workling out well? so we didnt get 70 seaters big freaking deal. Our tsa brother and sisters and leaving left and right, and the senior people could give a damn about 70 seaters. they are making 90-100 grand flying a 50 seater and they are just fine with that. geauxjets goes to about 10 places and their pilots aren't all that great or happy?

Plus we would have only gotten credit for a maximum of 5 years at TSA? Even you could mathematically deduce that i would be flying a bigger airplane for less money than i was making on a 50 seater? not to mention i would lose a quick week of vacation? So to sum it up, lose vacation, lose pay lose work protection and rules to fly 70 seaters? not in this lifetime.

I voted no, i do it again, and even if it put all of tsa's pilots out of work, i'd still do it again. Becuase you know what? TSA isnt going out of business becuase hulas needs TSA to make moeny to keep both airlines up and running. our local mec was in place for 5 years , we knew every move ( except all the wrongful terminations for a total of 7) tsa would make before they did--- it was a chess match and they were playing checkers---

the vote failed , MISERABLY, we stood our ground and we didnt need lawson and his croanies telling us it was a good deal. and im sure they got flack from duan the train when they reported TSA didnt bite on it.

as we say in the south. "*************************em and feed grits"
The bold should sum up why JC thought you guys should sign it, thats his type of deal. Take flying who cares what you make
 

Latest resources

Back
Top